Semileptonic Lambda baryon decay suppression

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Triple_S
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Baryon Decay Lambda
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the suppression of semileptonic decay modes of the Lambda baryon, specifically comparing the decay involving leptons to those involving pions. Participants explore potential reasons for this suppression, including considerations of phase space and helicity suppression.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the semileptonic decay mode (Lambda -> p + e- + anti ve) is suppressed by a factor of about 10^-4 compared to pion decay modes (Lambda -> p + pi-), seeking an explanation for this suppression.
  • Another participant challenges the idea of helicity suppression, suggesting that if it were the case, the semimuonic decay would be significantly larger than the semielectronic decay, indicating a possible misunderstanding of the suppression mechanisms.
  • A different participant argues that phase space should favor the three-body decay over the two-body decay, questioning the energy release in the two-body decay.
  • Further, a participant discusses the relationship between phase space and the number of decay products, suggesting that phase space suppression increases with more particles, particularly in the context of W boson interactions.
  • It is mentioned that the electron decay occurs more frequently than the muon decay by a factor of approximately 5, which is noted as a relevant factor in the phase space discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanisms behind the suppression of semileptonic decays, particularly regarding the roles of helicity suppression and phase space considerations. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of phase space dynamics and the influence of decay product mass on suppression factors, indicating that assumptions about energy release and particle interactions may not be fully explored.

Triple_S
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi there,

I'm currently studying the decay modes of the Lambda baryon (uds).
According to literature, the decay mode with leptons (e.g. Lambda -> p + e- + anti ve) is suppressed against the decay modes with pions (e.g. Lambda -> p + pi-) by a factor of about 10^-4.
I was looking for the reason for this suppression, but could'nt find anything. Could anyone explain it to me? I was thinking that it might be due to parity, cause it's not conserved in weak interactions, but I'm not sure whether that's correct.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think it's helicity suppression. If that were the case, the semimuonic decay would be much, much larger (about 7800x) than the semielectronic. It's probably 3-body vs. 2-body phase space.
 
Shouldn't the phase space favor the three-body decay? Not much energy released in the two-body decay.

The electron decay is more frequent than the muon decay by a factor of ~5, I can see the phase space factor there.
 
mfb said:
Shouldn't the phase space favor the three-body decay?

I can't do it in my head, except to note that phase space suppression goes up with increasing numbers of particles, especially when you have a W. The W propagator is trying to drive the e-nu system to high mass, and that bites into phase space. But what I am sure is that it's not helicity suppression, since the electron decay is 5x more frequent than the muon decay and not 1/7800 as frequent.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K