Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Sensitivity of lock-in amplifier

  1. Apr 20, 2013 #1

    I have a quick question whose answer is well-hidden on google since the key word of the search attempts is sensitivity, which of course returns results about phase-sensitive detection, and seemingly phase-sensitive detection only... My question is what the exact definition of the sensitivity of a lock-in amplifier is.

    cheers :biggrin:
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 20, 2013 #2

    jim hardy

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    No offers yet ?

    A question well phrased is half answered.
    And i'm not sure I know either what would be meant by "sensitivity" of a lock-in amplifier.

    They have an ability to recover a weak signal out of strong noise. Probably a practical definition would be an approximate ratio of the minimum useable signal to noise ratio, but i'm kinda guessing.

    Since a lock-in amplifier is effectively multiplying two signals, and how well that works depends on the phase between them, they employ "Phase Locking" to optimize.
    And that's not a straightforward subject.

    Try searching on terms"PLL capture ratio"

    and peruse this practical article:

    maybe you'll elaborate on where you ran across the term.
  4. Apr 21, 2013 #3
    There is plenty (and very good) information about lock-in amplifiers, so I have read my fair share. Therefore I have got an intuition what the sensitivity of the lock-in amplifier would specify, but this wasn't enough for a reliable conclusion.

    Your guess makes sense, but the ratio mentioned is actually the traditional definition of dynamical reserve, which is the ratio of the largest tolerable noise signal to the full-scale signal.

    Back to the question. I found an "extended" manual where the following were presented:

    Vout = 10A_e(A_vV_icosØ+Vos) {if the output is X}

    A_e= 1 or 10 per the Expand
    A_v= 1/Sensitivity
    V_i= magnitude of the signal
    Ø = phase between signal & reference
    V_os = offset (fraction of FS < 1.024)

  5. Apr 21, 2013 #4

    jim hardy

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Intuition usually gets one close -- even if pointed in wrong direction !

    Where there's not a universally accepted term for something, authors will often use what is intuitive to them. Is this an old reference, perhaps from 60's ?

    Looking at your equation, my intuition tells me the author uses A_v for "Amplification(of) Voltage"

    which is a term I used to run across way back when... it meant simply Voltage Gain.
    The product of V_i and reference is product of their magnitudes X cos(angle)
    i'll guess V_i is multiplied by A_v before arrival at the multiplier
    and magnitude of reference is accounted for by A_e

    So, 'sensitivity' to that author is simply: 1/(gain applied to input signal)

    but that's just what feels intuitive to me.

    I'm not well versed in lock-in amps as you have doubtless discerned.
    My 'Rock of Ages' for this subject is the AD630 datasheet. It provides precise A_v of 1, 2, 3 or 4 before presentation to multiplier..


    that's my best stab at it - doubtless there's somebody here more expert.

    old jim
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook