Separability of Hilbert Spaces

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Andre' Quanta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hilbert Hilbert spaces
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
Andre' Quanta
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Why we require the separability of Hilbert spaces in Quantum Mechanics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Andre' Quanta said:
Why we require the separability of Hilbert spaces in Quantum Mechanics?

In reality any actual observation is from a finite dimensional space - but sometimes of a large but unknown dimension. To handle that a limit is taken and you end up with Rigged Hilbert spaces which are separable.

To be specific the space is of vectors of finite dimension but of any size. Mathematically we take the dual which is the Rigged Hilbert space of this space. It is separable - but convergent only under a very weak topology. Such a large space isn't actually required in practice and part of the art of using Rigged Hilbert spaces is figuring out exactly what subset is needed:
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0502053Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
Because of results like the Stone-von Neumann theorem. In non-relativistic QM, this theorem asserts that any irreducible unitary realization of the (integrated form of the) canonical commutation relations on a complex Hilbert space ##H## (in principle, not necessarily separable) is unitarily equivalent to the standard realization in the separable space ##L^{2}(R^{3})##, i.e., only in a separable space you can get one such irreducible unitary realizations. Similar results hold for the representation theory of the Poincaré group in relativistic QM.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby