Separable Differential Equation (Perfect Derivative)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a separable differential equation of the form -y + xy' = 0, with the initial condition y(2) = 5. Participants explore the nature of the equation, questioning whether it can be treated as a perfect derivative and discussing its separability and linearity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the possibility of finding a perfect derivative and whether the equation is separable. There are attempts to manipulate the equation into a form suitable for integration, and questions arise about the validity of these manipulations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on the correct approach to finding an integrating factor and clarifying misconceptions about the separability of the equation. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly regarding the method of solving it.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need to divide by x to find the integrating factor, and there is confusion about the correct form of the equation for applying integration techniques. The discussion also touches on the requirements for linear differential equations.

scud0405
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




[tex]-y + xy' = 0[/tex] and y(2)=5


The Attempt at a Solution



This first part trips me up. I am supposed to find the perfect derivative, which is [tex](xy') = 0[/tex] ? Is this legal, or does the -y not allow for that?

If that is correct, then I know that I integrate that, which gives me [tex]xy = c[/tex]

Then, to solve for c, I just plug in 2 and 5.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it's not exact. And your solution assuming that is wrong. But it is separable. Try that.
 
It's also linear. Have you studied integrating factors?
 
Oh, I understand! Just multiply by e^-x, so the problem looks like this:

[tex]-ye^-^x + xe^-^xy' = 0[/tex]

Therefore:

[tex]xe^-^xy = c[/tex]

Correct?

I'm having trouble with the next problem also. The next problem is similar, but with a [tex]x^3[/tex] added to it. I can't think of any other way to do it other than by multiplying everything by e^-x and doing integration by parts to [tex]x^3e^-^x[/tex].Any tips for an easier way to do it?
 
Last edited:
No, your solution isn't correct. Your original equation

[tex]xy' - y = 0[/tex]

is not in the correct form to find the integrating factor. The coefficient of y' needs to be 1 so you need to divide by x before calculating the integrating factor. Also, as a side note, linear differential equations are typically written with the highest derivatives first much like polynomials, not that it matters that much.
 
Oh.. you're right.

It's not separable though, is it? When I try and separate it I cannot get the Ys on one side and the Xs on one side. Unless [tex]\frac{dy}{y} = \frac{dx}{x}[/tex] is the equation correctly separated.
 
remember that is [tex]\frac{1}{x}dx=\frac{1}{y}dy[/tex] You can integrate this.

As for the other method, do you know how to find an integrating factor for second order linear equations? It's generally not just multiply through by [tex]e^{-x}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Right. But is that the equation correctly separated?
 
Yes but I believe the problem is asking you to find an integrating factor.
 
  • #10
Okay, so if I divide by X, I get [tex]y' - \frac{y}{x} = 0[/tex]

So the integrating factor would be -x? That can't be right because that just gives me what I started out with.
 
  • #11
For y' + P(x)y = Q(x) the integrating factor is

[tex]R(x) = e^{\int P(x) dx}[/tex]
 
  • #12
[tex]e^\int^-^1^/^x[/tex] = [tex]e^-^l^n^x[/tex] = -x. So this means I would multiply the whole problem by -x which gives me what I start out with.

Or am I doing something wrong?
 
  • #13
Yes you are doing something wrong:

[tex]e^{- \ln(x)} = e^{\ln(x^{-1})}= x^{-1}[/tex]
 
  • #14
Ahhh! Finally, it makes sense! Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K