Dummit and Foote in Section 13.5 on separable extensions make some remarks about separable polynomials that I do not quite follow. The remarks follow Corollary 34 and its proof ...(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Corollary 34, its proof and the remarks read as follows:

In the above text by D&F, in the remarks after the proof we read:

" ... in characteristic ##p## the derivative of any power ##x^{pm}## of ##x^p## is identically ##0##:

##D_x( x^{pm} ) = pm x^{pm - 1 } = 0##

so it is possible for the degree of the derivative to decrease by more than ##1##.

If the derivative ##D_x p(x)## of the irreducible polynomial ##p(x)## is non-zero, however, , then just as before we conclude that ##p(x)## must be separable. ... ... "

My questions are as follows:

Question 1

I am assuming that when the degree of the derivative decreases by more than ##1, p(x)## is still relatively prime to ##D_x p(x)## and so ##p(x)## is separable ... is that the correct reasoning here ...

Question 2

In stating that "if the derivative ##D_x p(x)## of the irreducible polynomial ##p(x)## is non-zero, however, , then just as before we conclude that ##p(x)## must be separable". D&F are implying that if ##D_x p(x) = 0## then ##p(x)## is not separable (or not necessarily separable) ... is this the case ... if it is the case, why/how is this true ...

Hope that someone can help ...

Peter

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Separable Polynomials - Remarks by Dummit and Foote ... ...

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**