Separately excited DC motor problem (Electrical Engineering)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the characteristics and calculations related to a separately excited DC motor, specifically addressing the interpretation of its power rating, losses under no-load conditions, and the relevance of various losses in the context of the problem presented.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants clarify that the 20 HP rating refers to the output mechanical power (Pout) and the source voltage is indeed 600 V.
  • It is noted that under no-load conditions, the armature current is assumed to be zero, leading to the neglect of rotational losses (Prot) and armature copper losses.
  • One participant questions the relevance of field losses in the context of the problem, suggesting that they are not significant unless calculating efficiency.
  • Another participant challenges the notion of the motor being "ideal," stating that while no-load conditions may lead to zero rotational and armature losses, copper losses will occur under load conditions due to armature resistance.
  • It is proposed that while rotational losses may be zero at no-load, copper losses will be present when the motor is under load.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the definitions of power ratings and the conditions under which certain losses are neglected. However, there is disagreement regarding the characterization of the motor as "ideal" and the implications of losses under different loading conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying assumptions about the conditions under which losses are considered, particularly regarding the ideality of the motor and the implications of no-load versus loaded conditions.

Pipsqueakalchemist
Messages
138
Reaction score
20
Homework Statement
I have the image of the question below
Relevant Equations
Quadratic formula
Hello, so for this question I know how to solve it but I still have a few questions. First when the question means it's rated at 20 HP and 600 V, it's referring to the source voltage and Pin correct? Also in order to solve this question, the rotation loss Prot was neglected. This was because at No load condition the armature current was zero meaning that we were assuming a ideal DC motot hence Prot = 0 correct?

1670087081300.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pipsqueakalchemist said:
it's referring to the source voltage and Pin correct?
The 20HP rating denotes output mechanical power (i.e. gross mechanical power developed-mechanical losses)
Pipsqueakalchemist said:
This was because at No load condition the armature current was zero meaning that we were assuming a ideal DC motot hence Prot = 0 correct?
Right.
No load current is neglected, meaning zero armature copper loss and zero rotational loss.
 
cnh1995 said:
The 20HP rating denotes output mechanical power (i.e. gross mechanical power developed-mechanical losses)

Right.
No load current is neglected, meaning zero armature copper loss and zero rotational loss.
Ok so the rate 20 HP represents Pout correct?
Also in a ideal motor both rotational and armature loss are zero, but what about field loss?
thanks
 
Pipsqueakalchemist said:
Ok so the rate 20 HP represents Pout correct?
Also in a ideal motor both rotational and armature loss are zero, but what about field loss?
thanks
Field loss is not relevant in this problem as the motor is separately excited, and you are asked about the output power. The field loss component of the current does not flow through armature and is irrelevant here unless you want to calculate the efficiency (and if the field resistance was given).
cnh1995 said:
Right.
No load current is neglected, meaning zero armature copper loss and zero rotational loss
I think this statement is misguiding.
The motor is not "ideal" as there would be copper losses in the armature circuit when there is load on the motor (i.e. current in the armature circuit)
As the no load current is negligible, the motor seems be rotating smoothly and there are no friction/windage losses. This means the rotational losses (i.e. friction/windage) should be zero at any speed and any loading condition.

But there will be some copper loss in the armature circuit due to its resistance.

Only in case of no-load, armature copper loss and rotational loss are both 0. At any other loading condition, rotational loss will be 0, but copper loss will be non-zero.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K