simbil
- 20
- 0
Do I need to add more of my working to make it clearer to follow?
Looks good.simbil said:Finally got around to this again and I have worked out what may be a solution.
So, following your advice to find the velocity of the centre of mass as a function of angle:
We know that the energy E is constant such that the gravitic potential and kinetic are constant so E = mgh - 0.5mv^2
Before the rod falls, v is zero and h of COM = 1m, unit mass, so,
E = g
Therefore, g = mgh - 0.5mv^2
g = gh - 0.5v^2
Height can be expressed as a function of angle as h = rcosθ = cosθ, so,
g = gcosθ - 0.5v^2
and so the velocity as a function of angle is,
v^2 = 2g - 2gcosθ
If I am correct so far, the next step is to calculate the radial acceleration = v^2/r = v^2, so,
radial a = 2g - 2gcosθ
Tangential acceleration has already been calculated for the example as 0.75gsinθ
Almost. The horizontal component of the radial acceleration would be -radial.sinθ.Total acceleration horizontally = tangential.cosθ - radial.cosθ
Correct the above and you've got it.a = 0.75gsinθcosθ - cosθ(2g - 2gcosθ)
Unit mass so applying F= ma, horizontal force = 0.75gsinθcosθ - cosθ(2g - 2gcosθ)
Putting numbers into there gives results in line with what I would expect - is it right..?
Nope. Just took me a while to get around to it.simbil said:Do I need to add more of my working to make it clearer to follow?