simbil
- 20
- 0
Do I need to add more of my working to make it clearer to follow?
The discussion revolves around the separation of angular and linear momentum in systems such as an inverted pendulum and a rod subjected to various forces. Participants explore the mechanics of these systems, particularly in relation to running techniques and the effects of gravity on motion.
Participants express differing views on the relationship between angular and linear momentum, the behavior of the GRF, and the implications for running mechanics. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives on these topics.
Participants highlight limitations in their assumptions regarding the forces acting on the rod and the conditions under which the GRF operates. There are unresolved questions about the calculations needed to fully understand the dynamics of the systems discussed.
Looks good.simbil said:Finally got around to this again and I have worked out what may be a solution.
So, following your advice to find the velocity of the centre of mass as a function of angle:
We know that the energy E is constant such that the gravitic potential and kinetic are constant so E = mgh - 0.5mv^2
Before the rod falls, v is zero and h of COM = 1m, unit mass, so,
E = g
Therefore, g = mgh - 0.5mv^2
g = gh - 0.5v^2
Height can be expressed as a function of angle as h = rcosθ = cosθ, so,
g = gcosθ - 0.5v^2
and so the velocity as a function of angle is,
v^2 = 2g - 2gcosθ
If I am correct so far, the next step is to calculate the radial acceleration = v^2/r = v^2, so,
radial a = 2g - 2gcosθ
Tangential acceleration has already been calculated for the example as 0.75gsinθ
Almost. The horizontal component of the radial acceleration would be -radial.sinθ.Total acceleration horizontally = tangential.cosθ - radial.cosθ
Correct the above and you've got it.a = 0.75gsinθcosθ - cosθ(2g - 2gcosθ)
Unit mass so applying F= ma, horizontal force = 0.75gsinθcosθ - cosθ(2g - 2gcosθ)
Putting numbers into there gives results in line with what I would expect - is it right..?
Nope. Just took me a while to get around to it.simbil said:Do I need to add more of my working to make it clearer to follow?