I Separating Overlapping Event Horizons: Theory

anubodh
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
If 2 black holes have event horizons slightly overlapping,can they ever be separated "theoretically" into 2 separate event horizons given we can apply extremely high forces to pull them apart or will it keep stretching and overlapping even if they are pulled apart?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anubodh said:
If 2 black holes have event horizons slightly overlapping

This doesn't happen. What happens is the 2 black holes merge into one. When that happens there is only one event horizon, not two. There is no such thing as "overlapping event horizons".

anubodh said:
given we can apply extremely high forces to pull them apart

How would you "apply g forces" to a black hole?
 
@PeterDonis I get that after overlapping you get just 1 event horizon but the singularities inside are still separated.So,what i wanted to know was can we apply external forces in opposite directions so that these singularities start separating.I know it's practically not possible but i want to know whether it's theoretically possible or not.
 
anubodh said:
the singularities inside are still separated

No, they aren't. The singularities are not places in space; they are instants of time, which are to the future of all other instants inside the horizon. If two black holes merge, then there is only one singularity, not two, because there is only one "inside the horizon".

This is an area where you have to really train yourself to think in terms of spacetime, not space. A single black hole's horizon is not a 2-sphere; it's a 3-cylinder in spacetime, which you can imagine as a cylinder if you suppress one spatial dimension. The singularity is at the future endpoint of the interior of the cylinder.

When two black holes merge, in spacetime, there is really only one horizon, and always was--it's just shaped like a pair of trousers instead of a cylinder. The region where there are two "legs" of the trousers corresponds to the period of time before the holes merged, and the region where there is just one "trunk" of the trousers corresponds to the period of time after they merge. So there is only one "interior" and therefore only one singularity, at the future endpoint of the trunk of the trousers.

anubodh said:
can we apply external forces in opposite directions so that these singularities start separating.

No, because there is only one singularity. See above.
 
  • Like
Likes ComplexVar89
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Back
Top