I Separating Overlapping Event Horizons: Theory

Click For Summary
When two black holes with overlapping event horizons merge, they form a single event horizon and singularity, not two separate entities. The concept of overlapping event horizons is incorrect, as merging results in a unified structure in spacetime. Singularities are not spatial locations but rather instants in time, and once merged, there is only one singularity. The idea of applying external forces to separate singularities is theoretically impossible since only one singularity exists post-merger. Understanding this requires a shift in thinking from spatial dimensions to the nature of spacetime.
anubodh
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
If 2 black holes have event horizons slightly overlapping,can they ever be separated "theoretically" into 2 separate event horizons given we can apply extremely high forces to pull them apart or will it keep stretching and overlapping even if they are pulled apart?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anubodh said:
If 2 black holes have event horizons slightly overlapping

This doesn't happen. What happens is the 2 black holes merge into one. When that happens there is only one event horizon, not two. There is no such thing as "overlapping event horizons".

anubodh said:
given we can apply extremely high forces to pull them apart

How would you "apply g forces" to a black hole?
 
@PeterDonis I get that after overlapping you get just 1 event horizon but the singularities inside are still separated.So,what i wanted to know was can we apply external forces in opposite directions so that these singularities start separating.I know it's practically not possible but i want to know whether it's theoretically possible or not.
 
anubodh said:
the singularities inside are still separated

No, they aren't. The singularities are not places in space; they are instants of time, which are to the future of all other instants inside the horizon. If two black holes merge, then there is only one singularity, not two, because there is only one "inside the horizon".

This is an area where you have to really train yourself to think in terms of spacetime, not space. A single black hole's horizon is not a 2-sphere; it's a 3-cylinder in spacetime, which you can imagine as a cylinder if you suppress one spatial dimension. The singularity is at the future endpoint of the interior of the cylinder.

When two black holes merge, in spacetime, there is really only one horizon, and always was--it's just shaped like a pair of trousers instead of a cylinder. The region where there are two "legs" of the trousers corresponds to the period of time before the holes merged, and the region where there is just one "trunk" of the trousers corresponds to the period of time after they merge. So there is only one "interior" and therefore only one singularity, at the future endpoint of the trunk of the trousers.

anubodh said:
can we apply external forces in opposite directions so that these singularities start separating.

No, because there is only one singularity. See above.
 
  • Like
Likes ComplexVar89

Thread 'Euclidean geometry and gravity'

I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
View full post »

Thread 'Jackson: justification of the Poynting vector by GR'

The Poynting vector is a definition, that is supposed to represent the energy flow at each point. Unfortunately, the only observable effect caused by the Poynting vector is through the energy variation in a volume subject to an energy flux through its surface, that is, the Poynting theorem. As a curl could be added to the Poynting vector without changing the Poynting theorem, it can not be decided by EM only that this should be the actual flow of energy at each point. Feynman, commenting...
View full post »

Thread 'Train Fall Paradox'

Train Fall Paradox A train is running on a long bridge over a river. A series of bombs planted on the bridge by terrorists explode simultaneously, and the bridge collapses into dust in an instant. The train falls while keeping its cars in a horizontal line and hits the river. All the cars receive equal damage. However, in the inertial frame of reference in which the train had been at rest, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the bombs at the front explode earlier. The first car falls...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Is crossing a black hole's event horizon possible?
Replies
46
Views
7K
I Falling through the event horizon of an evaporating black hole
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
I I don't see how a black hole's event horizon can be crossed
2
Replies
73
Views
831
A Timelike curves on event horizon
Replies
7
Views
2K
B Lowering a rope through the event horizon
Replies
12
Views
1K
I Do any real macroscopic black holes have a singularity?
Replies
11
Views
2K
B Theories about light and time near a black hole
Replies
20
Views
2K
I You can't actually enter a blackhole?
Replies
40
Views
3K
B Can event horizons cross for passing black holes at high speed
Replies
24
Views
4K
B Entering a black hole -- I know I must be wrong (Help me understand why)
Replies
29
Views
3K