Undergrad Separation of variables for Named Probability Density Distributions

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the conditions under which a joint probability density distribution can be expressed as the product of individual distributions. It questions whether this factorization is determined by the properties of the distributions themselves or by the characteristics of the variables involved. A complete list of named distributions is referenced, emphasizing those limited to exponential terms. The key condition for the equality to hold is identified as independence among the variables. Overall, the conversation highlights the relationship between independence and the factorization of probability distributions.
redtree
Messages
335
Reaction score
15
TL;DR
What are the named Probability Density Distributions for which separation of variables can be performed?
Given a probability density distribution ##P(\vec{x})##, for what named distributions is the following true:
\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
P(\vec{x}) &= P_1(x_1) P_2(x_2) ... P_n(x_n)
\end{split}
\end{equation}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you think that that equality is determined by the distribution or by some property of ## \vec{x} ##?

Do you have a complete list of 'named distributions'?
 
So what condition is necessary and sufficient for ## P(x_1, x_2, ... ,x_n) = P_1(x_1) P_2(x_2) ... P_n(x_n) ##?
 
pbuk said:
So what condition is necessary and sufficient for ## P(x_1, x_2, ... ,x_n) = P_1(x_1) P_2(x_2) ... P_n(x_n) ##?
Independence
 
  • Like
Likes Office_Shredder and pbuk
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K