Sequence of integers and arithmetic progressions

hudson
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
given any two numbers k,j
what is the largest sequence of integers such that the sum of any k consecutive terms is negative and the sum of any j consecutive terms is positive
and
how may we find a subset containing k of the first n numbers such that out of all subsets with k elements, this subset has the smallest arithmetic progression with common difference j. and out of all subsets with k elements, does this subset contain the largest arithmetic progression for some other integer?

ideas would be very much appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hudson said:
how may we find a subset containing k of the first n numbers such that out of all subsets with k elements, this subset has the smallest arithmetic progression with common difference j.

Partition {1,..n} into j arithmetic progressions with common difference j. Choose one (if k<j) or {k/j} (if k>j) numbers from each partition.
 
I don't know about the terminology required or if this is even a shot in the right direction, but for the sum of a sequence of k integers to be negative, [k/2] +1 integers must lie to the left of origin and [k/2] to the right.

Assuming j>k, for the sum of sequence to be positive, [k/2]+1 must lie to the right of the origin, and again, [k/2] to the left.

As the question says that for any sequence of k integers amongst a set, the sum should be negative and in the same set, the sum of j integers must be positive.

Let us assume a set of 'n' integers. If n is odd, and the set centered at 0, then it ranges from (-[n/2],[n/2]). In this case sum for k=n will be zero. For k<n, there will always be a set of k integers which has positive sum. Thus, the set cannot be centered at zero.

For the set centered at any point to the left of zero (say -1), the maximum value for k can be k<=n-1, for which the sum of any k integers is zero. For the set centered at any point -p ( p to the left of zero), the maximum value of k<=n-p.

However, in this case, there is no value of j which satisfies the required condition, because there will always be p cases where the sum of integers is less than zero.

Idk, it seems like there is no possible set in which consecutive integers can simultaneously satisfy both conditions. Again, I'm not familiar with any branch of number theory, just my 2 cents worth. Are there any other conditions on the sequence of integers that we're missing (perhaps that the sequence is an ap or a gp or something) ?
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top