How can I write this sequence in terms of factorials?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on expressing the mathematical sequence n(n^2 - 1) in terms of factorials. The correct expression is identified as (n + 1)! / (n - 2)!. Participants discuss the method to derive this expression by expanding the numerator and denominator and canceling common factors. The importance of understanding factorial notation and its application in this context is emphasized. The thread concludes with an encouragement to explore the cancellation process to clarify the solution.
martinrandau
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Can anybody help me solving this?

Write in terms of factorials

n((n^2)-1)

The correct answer is
(n+1)!/(n-2)!

but I don't know how to get there, and since it's week- end I have no chance to ask anyone teachers, etc.
//Martin
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
n(n2-1) = n(n-1)(n+1)
 
Originally posted by martinrandau
Can anybody help me solving this?

Write in terms of factorials

n((n^2)-1)

The correct answer is
(n+1)!/(n-2)!


Please notice the expression marks (!). The task is not to factorise it by "normal" means, but to find an expression as a sequence.
ex. 7! = 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5 x 6 x 7 = 5040
n!= 1 x 2 x 3 x...x n

It's called the factorial r (!).
Thank you for your help anyway!
 
Originally posted by martinrandau
The correct answer is
(n+1)!/(n-2)!

I'll give you a hint.

Expand the numerator and denominator of the above ratio and cancel the factors common to both. For instance, the numerator is:

(n+1)!=(n+1)(n)(n-1)(n-2)...

Get the idea?
 
Yes!:smile:
Thank you!

//Martin
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top