Set Theory Proofs: f:X->Y Function and Subset B of Y

Ed Quanta
Messages
296
Reaction score
0
Let f:X->Y be a function

1) Given any subset B of Y, prove that f(f^-1(B)) is a subset of B

2) Prove that f(f^-1(B))=B for all subsets B of Y if and only if f is surjective


Help anybody?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(If this is homework, you should post in the HW help section... let me know and I'll move it)

1) Given any subset B of Y, prove that f(f^-1(B)) is a subset of B

Sometimes, problems become more clear just by restating it.

Note that your goal is to prove:

If x is in f(f^-1(B)) then x is in B.

So what is the criterion for x to be in f(f^-1(B))?

Ask this question a few times, and I think it solves itself.


2) Prove that f(f^-1(B))=B for all subsets B of Y if and only if f is surjective

I think the theorem and proof of (1) will provide some insight. Also, you might consider what happens if either of these conditions fails.

In the end, I again think it will almost solve itself if you dig into more detail.
 
It's not homework, just some problems in my topology book that I have been thinking about. My problem with 1) which I should have stated earlier is that I don't see why f(f^-1(B)) is a subset of B, and not simply equal to it.
 
Well, I think your second question gives a strong clue as to how to find an example where f(f^1(B)) != B. :smile:

It doesn't have to be complicated; try something very simple, like a function whose domain has only 1 or 2 elements, and is not surjective.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top