Set theory. What does this mean?

omoplata
Messages
327
Reaction score
2
If \mathbb{Z} is the set of integers, what does \mathbb{Z/2Z} mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is the integers modulo 2.

\mathbb{Z} is the set of integers, and 2\mathbb{Z} is the set of even integers, and \mathbb{Z}/\mathbb{2Z} is the set of integers modulo the ideal of even integers.

The notation A/B crops up all over the place in many different contexts, so here's a general explanation of roughly what it means:

A is some structure (in this case a ring, but it could be a group, a Lie algebra, a topological space...) and B is some special substructure of A (or in some contexts sometimes an equivalence relation on A). A/B is what you get when you regard the members of B as being equivalent. The exact definition depends somewhat on context. So in this case, we regard all the even integers as equivalent and by extension all the odd integers as equivalent, leaving just two elements in \mathbb{Z}/(2\mathbb{Z}): the set of odd integers and the set of even integers (the equivalence classes).

More generally, we could take the set \mathbb{Z}/(n\mathbb{Z})=\{[0],[1],\ldots,[n-1]\}, where the square brackets mean 'equivalence class of', so [k] = \{\ldots, k-2n, k-n,k,k+n,k+2n,\ldots\} as the integers modulo n.

Hope that's useful; it's hard to know what level to pitch it at. If you want more details or less jargon I'll be happy to rephrase.
 
Hi omoplata! :smile:

That is actually a notation from abstract algebra. You probably know that 2\mathbb{Z} is all the multiples of 2 (thus all even numbers).

Now, on \mathbb{Z}, we can put the following equivalence relation:

x\sim y~\Leftrightarrow~x-y\in 2\mathbb{Z}

Then \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z} is simply the quotient of this equivalence relation (thus the set of all equivalence classes).

It is easy to see that

\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}=\{2\mathbb{Z},2\mathbb{Z}+1\}

thus the set contains two elements. We can easily put an addition and multiplication on this set and this gives us a field with two elements.

I hope that is clear!
 
I get it now. Thanks a lot.
 
Note that although henry_m and Micromass are using different words, they are saying the same thing!
 
HallsofIvy said:
Note that although henry_m and Micromass are using different words, they are saying the same thing!

Well, yeah. I understood that.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top