Setting Up a Pendulum Experiment to Test a Program

  • Thread starter Thread starter franznietzsche
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiemnt Pendulum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around setting up an experiment to test a program that predicts the motion of a pendulum. The experiment aims to measure the pendulum's position using a video camera for frame-by-frame analysis and a strobe light for timing. The proposed method involves using a poster board backdrop with gradations based on the program's predictions to compare the pendulum's actual position. Concerns about perspective and parallax measurements are raised, suggesting that these factors could affect accuracy. Additionally, there is curiosity about the program's ability to predict chaotic motion, as traditional equations only apply under certain conditions. The conversation also touches on the complexities of driving the pendulum and the limitations of the program, which is designed for a simple pendulum rather than more complex scenarios.
franznietzsche
Messages
1,503
Reaction score
6
A while back i posted a thread on a program designed to analyze and predict the motion of a pendulum. Now i need to set up an experiment to test the program. For those who don't remember/didn't see the last thread, the program can predict the motion of the pendulum at any time in its swing, though its accuracy is unknown, hence the purpose of the experiment.

I need to somehow devise a method for measuring the position of the swinging pendulum, i have easy access to a video camera for frame by frame analysis, as well as a strobe light that i can set to a speicific number of flashes per minute.

The best idea i could come up with was to use a poster board back drop with gradations marking where the pendulum should be at certain time intervals from release (the markings would be based upon the programs predictions) and then compare the pendulums position on the video with the markings. I was thinking due to an issue with perspective (the distance between the pendulum and the markins combined with the wide displacements i planned on testing would cause the same problem as a measuring cup with gradations located on the outside) parallax measurements could be necessary in order to calculate the actual position to then compare with the data.

Any other ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by mmwave
Yeah, use the video camera as the swinging mass & parallax won't be a problem. Just kidding.

I'm curious if your program can predict the possibly chaotic motion of the pendulum. The period behaves well over extremes of amplitude but the actual position vs. time can become chaotic. The textbooks typically give only the equations valid when sin(theta) is approx. theta.

the motion only becomes chaotic in the case of both damped and driven pendulums as i recall, which the program does not address, it is written for a simple pendulum only.
 
I actually designed and constructed this experiment, using a vertically driven pendulum. Though my methods were laughably crude, and do not warrant mention. (My resources were extremely limited.)

How are you planning to drive the pendulum... are you planning to drive the pendulum?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top