Settle the Debate: Boiling Time of Water at Different Temperatures on Stove

  • Thread starter Thread starter tammikec
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Discussion
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on whether water at 100 degrees Celsius will boil faster than water at 50 degrees Celsius when both are heated on the same stove. Participants agree that the pan with 100-degree water will boil first, as it has less temperature increase to achieve boiling. The conversation also touches on the nuances of boiling versus evaporation, with some clarifying that boiling occurs at the solid-liquid interface and involves bubble nucleation. Additionally, there are mentions of superheating in microwaves, where water can exceed boiling temperature without bubbling until disturbed. Overall, the consensus is that the pan with water at 100 degrees will reach boiling faster due to its initial temperature advantage.
  • #31
WhyIsItSo said:
Boiling is the liquid-vapor phase change.

Freezing is the solid-liquid phase change

See enthalpy of fusion, enthalpy of vaporization


Hmmm

No, that's not at all what I'm talking about.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
cyrusabdollahi said:
Yes, thank you! A link! :smile:

See, NOT the same thing.

I don't know what you read in the link that doc al gave, but it clearly contradicted what you are saying.

Zz.
 
  • #33
Really? :frown: Arggg...hehe let me type what I have in my book.
 
  • #34
Evaporation occurs at the liquid-vapor interface when the vapor pressure is less than the saturation pressure of the liquid at a given temperature.

Boiling, on the other hand, occurs at the solid-liquid interface when a liquid is brought into contact with a surface maintained at a temperature T_s sufficiently above the saturation temperature T_{sat} of the liquid. The boiling process is characterized by the rapid motion of vapor bubbles that form at the solid-liquid interface, detatch from the surface when they reach a certain size, and attempt to rise to the free surface of the liquid.

That is why, boiling, is not exactly the same effect as evaporation, IMO.

One involves nucleation, the other does not.
 
Last edited:
  • #35
cyrusabdollahi said:
I've got one for you, prove it! :wink:
Prove what? Mpemba? Sure! Let me know when you're visiting these parts.

People: Cyrus is pointing out that while evaporation is a phase change that occurs at the liquid-vapor interface, boiling is the same phase change which occurs predominantly at a solid-liquid interface (the "interface" being in the real world, not on a phase diagram). To be correct, there is some bubble nucleation within the liquid itself, arising from density fluctuations, but for most common vessels (nothing that has a special surface treatment), the majority of bubbles do nucleate on the container walls.

Edit: Was typing this up before I saw Cyrus' last post, in which he finally decides not to be enigmatic about his earlier post.
 
Last edited:
  • #36
Gokul43201 said:
Prove what? Mpemba? Sure! Let me know when you're visiting these parts.

:smile: I was just giving you a hard time, I know its true! :approve:
 
  • #37
:smile:

Gokul43201 said:
the majority of bubbles do nucleate on the container walls.
In my experience, the bubbles nucleate at the location of the heat source.
Not quite the same thing.
Which makes sense since that's where the energy is to generate the phase change.

In the case of a microwave oven, you can get some peculiar results.
cyrusabdollahi said:
Do you think it all boils instantly into a vapor?
Yep! :biggrin:
At least judging by the number of cups water I've mopped up off the bottom of the microwave after they explosively emptied. :smile:
 
  • #38
They did that because the microwaves do not agitate it like an open heat source. They vibrate the polar molecules. When you pick the cup up, you agitate it and it rapidly nucleates.
 
Last edited:
  • #39
cyrusabdollahi said:
They did that because the microwaves do not agitate it like an open heat source. They vibrate the polar molecules. When you pick the cup up, you agitate it and it rapidly nucleates.
At least you agree that the entire mass got heated to boiling all at once. :smile:

I'm so glad they did it before I picked them up. :eek:
 
  • #40
Did you touch them or add anything to it?
 
  • #41
Do you reckon we've scared the OP off? :rolleyes:
 
  • #42
NoTime said:
:smile:


In my experience, the bubbles nucleate at the location of the heat source.
Not quite the same thing.
Which makes sense since that's where the energy is to generate the phase change.

In the case of a microwave oven, you can get some peculiar results.

Yep! :biggrin:
At least judging by the number of cups water I've mopped up off the bottom of the microwave after they explosively emptied. :smile:
Both of your comments are related issues.

In the first case (and I recently had cause to research this extensively) we need to be careful with the term "nucleation". It is not specific to boiling, but is also a factor in the process of freezing.

In the case of where the bubbles are forming, yes, you might often observe that they seem to mostly occur at the bottom of the pot. Try it, however, with something that transmits the heat more evenly, and you will see a lot more bubbles forming on the sides.

Now that I see what Cyrus was getting at, I can say he is correct. The nucleation is occurring because the temperature of the water is right about at boiling point, and the air bubbles (and even imperfections in the surface of the pot) make it easier for vaporization to occur. In effect, this is "seeding" the formation of vapor bubbles.

In your microwave, you are probably boiling your water in a glazed cup. This cup has very smooth surfaces, I'm willing to bet, and provides little to assist in the formation of vapor bubbles. Hence, the water can superheat - be hotter than the boiling point without actually boiling. When you add your coffee, spoon, sugar, whatever, you introduce something which seeds nucleation; likely in the form of tiny air bubbles. Since there is far more energy than the minimum required to boil the water, this event violently coverts this excess energy into vaporization; thus the "volcano" effect.

This is the same thing for supercooling; again, it is because there is nothing to seed nucleation. Pure water, undisturbed in a smooth container, will not freeze until something like -45C (not sure of the exact number).
 
  • #43
cyrusabdollahi said:
Did you touch them or add anything to it?
The usual scenerio was that I heard a whoomp.
The microwave shuts down and water starts dripping out the door.
Took to setting the time a lot lower after it happened a few times.
I tried watching with the light on to see if I could catch it in the act, but the water just boiled in the cup.

The watched pot never explodes :biggrin:

WhyIsItSo said:
Try it, however, with something that transmits the heat more evenly, and you will see a lot more bubbles forming on the sides.
I was more referring to the fact that only the part of the pot in contact with the heater bubbles. Sure, if you heat it evenly then it all bubbles. You do need energy to make this happen.

WhyIsItSo said:
Hence, the water can superheat - be hotter than the boiling point without actually boiling.
I'm sure this is what's happening, when the conditions are just right.
I have seen the bubble up effect from adding stuff.
That's just a minor fizz.
The thing I'm talking about will empty the cup!
You can hear it go off too.

It would also happen with styrofoam cups, not just glazed.

I've never seen the newer turntable models do this, probably too much vibration.
 
  • #44
superheating water

so, is it possible to superheat water in a completely smooth container free of impurities until it simply vaporizes without it ever boiling?
 
  • #45
If the pan with 100 degree water was at the bottom of Death Valley, and the pan with the 50 degree water was at the top of Mt. Everest (but with equal ambient air temperatures), it might be a close race...
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
34K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K