Shape of field line in an electric dipole

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the intersection point C(m,0) of an electric field line from a dipole consisting of charges +q at A(0,h) and -q at B(0,-h) in the xy-plane. The application of Gauss' law leads to a flux equation that appears to have no valid solutions for m, indicating a potential error in the setup or assumptions made during the integration process. Participants clarify the correct approach to integrating the electric field contributions from the charges and emphasize the importance of symmetry in determining the field across concentric rings.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric dipoles and their field lines
  • Familiarity with Gauss' law and its applications
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Concept of electric field components and symmetry in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of electric field lines for dipoles
  • Study the application of Gauss' law in different geometries
  • Practice integration of electric field equations in cylindrical coordinates
  • Explore the concept of electric field symmetry in multi-charge systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, as well as anyone involved in solving problems related to electric fields and dipoles.

darkrystal
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a xy-plane, we have a +q charge in A(0,h) and a -q charge in B(0,-h).
Let's take a field line passing through A, that has horizontal slope in A. Find the point C(m,0) where this field line intersects the X axis.

Homework Equations



I think Gauss' law [tex]\epsilon_0 \oint \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{A}=q[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution



Let's take a surface passing through A and following the field lines till the y=0 plane. Apply the Gauss' law to it: the flux is only through the base of this surface, so that we should get
[tex]\displaystyle q=\epsilon_0 \int d\Phi = \epsilon_0 \int_0^m \frac{2khq}{(x^2+h^2)^{\frac32}} \cdot 2 \pi x dx[/tex]​
where the second integral is the flux calculated for concentric rings around the origin. This equation, though, has no solutions for m, since it reduces to
[tex]\displaystyle h(\frac{1}{h}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{h^2+m^2}})=1[/tex]​
which is clearly impossible...

Thank you all for your time, and please forgive my bad english and my even worse physics :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's early and I think I'm missing something here but I'll get the ball rolling, I'm starting by assuming you got to the integral correctly and had the correct integrand

First, what happened to k? Second, you're integrating over x in that integral, the only dependency on x is just, well, that single x
 
I'll write it in a bit more detail. Let's take the flux across a ring ([tex]x[/tex] to [tex]x+dx[/tex]). The distance of every point of this ring from the two charges is the same, so the electric field must be the same on the whole ring. We get this field by multiplying by 2 the y-component of the field generated by the first charge only (this should be true by symmetry). Putting all together, the field SHOULD be [tex](2) \cdot \frac{kq}{x^2+h^2} \cdot \frac{h}{\sqrt{x^2+h^2}}[/tex], where the first 2 is to take in account the doubling I was talking about, the first fraction is the field generated by the first charge, and the second the cosine of the angle (to get only one the y-component). Then I'm multiplying all by the area of the ring, and that's all for the integrand.
For k... that's what puzzles me, mainly. Taking what I can out of the integral, I get a [tex]\epsilon_0 4 \pi k[/tex], and everything magically vanishes...

For the integral, I got [tex]\int \frac{x}{(x^2+h^2)^{\frac32}} = - \frac{1}{\sqrt{h^2+x^2}}[/tex], and I think this should be correct (anyways, if anybody is willing to check...)

Just one last thing: in the integrand... there isn't only one x... I couldn't get what you meant, sorry

Thank you very much for your answer, anyway!
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K