Shield low-frequency magnetic fields, but not high-frequency ones

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the challenge of shielding strong (1 Tesla) DC magnetic fields with a high attenuation factor (10^4 or better) while allowing high-frequency AC magnetic fields above 10 kHz to pass through. Mu-metal is identified as unsuitable due to its compromise on coercivity for high permeability. The use of iron is recommended for its high coercivity, and alternative methods such as constructing a waveguide or utilizing a cell-phone repeater-like setup are proposed. The discussion also suggests using numerical simulation tools like OOMMF and NMAG for modeling the magnetic shielding system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic field concepts, including DC and AC fields
  • Familiarity with materials like mu-metal and iron in magnetic applications
  • Knowledge of magnetic shielding principles and coercivity
  • Basic skills in numerical simulation software, specifically OOMMF and NMAG
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of Yttrium Iron Garnet (YIG) as a ferromagnetic insulator
  • Learn about the design and implementation of active magnetic shielding techniques
  • Explore the principles of waveguide design for magnetic fields
  • Download and experiment with OOMMF and NMAG for magnetic field simulations
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and researchers involved in magnetic shielding applications, particularly those working with DC magnetic fields and high-frequency AC environments.

kvt
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am wondering if it is possible to shield strong (1 Tesla) DC magnetic fields with high attenuation factor (10^4 or better) WITHOUT also shielding AC magnetic fields above frequencies of ~10kHz.

I have looked at mu-metal, which as far as I can tell shields DC but also AC fields to some extent, and active magnetic shielding, for which I could not find anything with a high enough shielding factor.

The to-be-shielded region would be approximately 0.1m x 0.5m x 0.5m in size.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To shield your volume from a 1T ambient field, you need a material with the highest coercivity (or saturation field level) possible. Mu-metal is inappropriate because it sacrifices coercivity in order to get high permeability. You'll be using iron, and lots of it. If you could settle for a small shielding factor, you might use disconnected slabs at a large distance--the windows between them would let high frequencies penetrate. It won't be easy to achieve a 10^4 shielding factor this way, however.

Another thought is to build a magnetic shield with open ends that functions as a waveguide beyond cutoff below 10 kHz. I expect it will be quite large compared to the dimensions you list.

A wider, more "out there" thought--maybe you could install something akin to a cell-phone "repeater" inside your closed shield, that is, put a big antenna inside that is connected to a big antenna outside.
 
There are two parts here.

1) Sans AC shielding. This means you're going to either need either a thin metal (E&M textbooks calculate the frequency dependent penetration depth using Maxwell equations), or an insulator. The only ferromagnetic insulator that comes to mind is Yttrium Iron Garnet (YIG) and its 4pi Ms isn't very large.

2) Magnetic shielding. The geometry and dynamics of your field source is important here. Without specific details, I can only give a general approach:

Any ferromagnetic material you do use, can be thought of as a collection of of little dipoles (i.e. North South magnets). Your task is to arrange them such that they cancel the field in the desired location. If you use high coercivity material, you can think of your little N-S magnets having a fixed orientation in space. A highly permeable material means your little N-S are free to re-orient themselves. They will try to align themselves with the local field. The local field will be a combination of the neighboring N-S magnets, the applied field, exchange field, and anisotropy fields...

Ok, this is getting a little more involved than I expected. If you have time, download a copy of OOMMF or NMAG and just numerically simulate the system. They're both open source (i.e. free). Expect about a week of learning. OOMMF get's kind of tricky, but I don't know if NMAG is any better. Post here if you get stuck.
 
Thread 'Colors in a plasma globe'
I have a common plasma globe with blue streamers and orange pads at both ends. The orange light is emitted by neon and the blue light is presumably emitted by argon and xenon. Why are the streamers blue while the pads at both ends are orange? A plasma globe's electric field is strong near the central electrode, decreasing with distance, so I would not expect the orange color at both ends.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
791
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
523