Shifting coordinates for mechanical problems

AI Thread Summary
Shifting coordinate systems in mechanical problems allows for the same physical results, though some frames simplify calculations. The process involves projecting forces into components aligned with the chosen axes, such as resolving gravitational force along a slope. While it may seem challenging to solve problems in non-aligned frames, vector calculations enable this by allowing projections in any direction. Different coordinate systems, like cylindrical or spherical coordinates, can be advantageous for specific scenarios, such as electric fields or orbital mechanics. Ultimately, selecting the appropriate coordinate frame is crucial for effectively addressing physics problems.
aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
More and more my teacher has talked about how results for mechanical problems are the same no matter what our coordinate system is (though it may be easier to calculate them in some coordinate frames). I must however admit, that I have never really had a clear explanation of what it means to do a problem in different coordinates. Suppose we have a point mass sliding down a frictionless slope and want to find its acceleration. We project the force of gravity onto the direction parallel to the slope and find the acceleration of it. Is this procedure of splitting your force vector into vectors in different directions, what is meant by shifting the coordinate frame? Because if so, how would you ever solve a problem in another frame than the one with axis parallel to the slope and perpendicular to it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Imagine the coordinate system with x parallel to the flat ground and y perpendicular to the flat ground. Could you still find the force along the direction of the slope?
 
Yes by projecting gravity perpendicular and parallel to the slope. But isn't that the same as changing coordinate system.
 
Different co-ordinates can mean a lot of things. Apart from the fact that it's often easier to work with your axes at an angle (Resolving forces parallel and perpendicular to an incline for example), you may find it's easier to use really wild co-ordinates like cylindrical and spherical polar co-ordinates.

For example, in calculating the electric field around a wire we would use cylindrical co-ordinates. In a problem involving satellites and orbits, we'd use spherical ones.

But as to your question about solving a problem in a different frame than tilted along the slope? The answer is to use vector calculations, which can be quite difficult. Physics is often about finding crafty ways to tackle a problem and choosing the right frame is the number one step.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top