SHM and Circular Motion Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating various quantities related to the simple harmonic motion (SHM) of a skyscraper during an earthquake, specifically focusing on a period of 8 seconds and an amplitude of 70 cm. Participants clarify that the radius of the circle representing SHM is indeed equal to the amplitude, which is a key geometric insight. There is a debate on whether circular motion equations are necessary, but it is concluded that SHM-related equations suffice for the calculations. The importance of expressing the motion as a function of time is emphasized to better understand the relationship between SHM and circular motion. Overall, the conversation highlights the geometric nature of SHM without needing complex equations.
acomet
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Q: During an earthquake, a skyscraper is designed to sway back and forth with simple harmonic motion with a period of 8 secs. The amplitude at the top floor of a particular earthquake is 70 cm. With respect to the simple harmonic motion of the top floor, calculate the following quantities:

a) The radius of the circle used to represent the SHM
b) The speed of the object moving round the circle
c) The angular velocity
d) The maximum speed at the top floor

I am in particular confused about part a). Would the solving of this question require the use of circular motion equations as well, or would SHM-related equations be enough to answer this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am in particular confused about part a). Would the solving of this question require the use of circular motion equations as well, or would SHM-related equations be enough to answer this?
Neither - it does not require any equations at all - only geometry.

You should not be doing these problems by trying to remember which equation goes where.
How does a circle represent SHM?
 
Can you express the motion of the top floor as a function of time? I think if you wrote it out, It might be more obvious what you're looking for...

*HINT* Think unit circle...
 
So would the radius of the circle be equal to the amplitude?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top