Is a Measure Theory Course Necessary for a PhD in Engineering?

AI Thread Summary
A new PhD student in engineering, focused on signals analysis in neuroscience, is considering a course in measure theory offered by their university. The course aims to provide foundational knowledge in measure theory and the Lebesgue integral, which are essential for advanced studies in various mathematical fields, including probability theory. Key outcomes include understanding sigma-algebras, measurable functions, and the properties of the Lebesgue integral, among others.The discussion highlights the importance of having a solid background in real analysis before enrolling in the measure theory course. Participants emphasize that while it is possible to work in signal analysis without deep knowledge of functional analysis or measure theory, a lack of these foundational concepts can lead to difficulties in understanding more theoretical topics. The consensus is that prior completion of an undergraduate real analysis course is crucial for success in the measure theory class.
thrillhouse86
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
Hi All, I am a new phd student in engineering, working in signals analysis in neuroscience who seems to be doing a lot of work in statistics and probability theory. My uni is offering a course in measure theory. The course profile says:

"The course is an introduction to measure theory and Lebesgue integral. A sound knowledge of measure theory and the Lebesgue integral is a starting point to undertake advanced studies in partial differential equations, nonlinear analysis, the calculus of variations and probability theory."

The outcomes of the course are stated as:

"1 Appreciate the central role of sigma-algebras and measure in integration theory;
2 Work with measurable functions and understand their importance to the definition of the integral;
3 Work with the properties of the Lebesgue integral;
4 Generate measures including Stieltjes measures;
5 Use the relationship between the Riemann and Lebesgue integrals on the real line;
6 Understand the relationship between of functions of bounded variation and absolute continuity and the role they play in fundamental theorem of integral calculus;
7 Decompose measures and appreciate the role this decomposition plays in the Radon-Nikodym & Riesz representation theorems;
8 Gain a working knowledge of function spaces and modes of convergence;
9 Work with the integral on product spaces using the relationship with repeated integrals;
10 Apply results from integration theory to other areas of mathematics."

Given that I am not a pure mathematician would it be worth doing this course?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is always good to know something about functional analysis, measure theory and probability if you want to do theoretical work in signal. But can you survive without knowing any of these? I think you absolutely could. You probably could learn a lot about signal, system, estimation etc without knowing a lot of real analysis. But of course, there are some more theoretical/mathematical topics you would find confusing without those knowledge. I still remember the nightmare when I took a class that I was supposed to learn H-2/H-infinity with very little background. Needless to say it was a total disaster. So, it definitely would help if you know functional analysis.
But before you register for the class, you would definitely need to have taken the undergrad real analysis courses.
 
What's the prerequisite of this course? It sounds like you need at least undergraduate real analysis course (at the level of Rudin's PMA or equivalent), as chingkui suggested.
 
Depends on your knowledge. If you haven't done any serious analysis before, it'll probably be undoable.
 
ok thanks guys, the school does run a real analysis course which I somewhat arrogantly thought I could just skip. So it appears that everyone rather strongly feels that this is NOT a course to do without a background in real analysis.

Thanks
 
TL;DR Summary: What topics to cover to safely say I know arithmetic ? I am learning arithmetic from Indian NCERT textbook. Currently I have finished addition ,substraction of 2 digit numbers and divisions, multiplication of 1 digit numbers. I am moving pretty slowly. Can someone tell me what topics to cover first to build a framework and then go on in detail. I want to learn fast. It has taken me a year now learning arithmetic. I want to speed up. Thanks for the help in advance. (I also...
guys i am currently studying in computer science engineering [1st yr]. i was intrested in physics when i was in high school. due to some circumstances i chose computer science engineering degree. so i want to incoporate computer science engineering with physics and i came across computational physics. i am intrested studying it but i dont know where to start. can you guys reccomend me some yt channels or some free courses or some other way to learn the computational physics.
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...

Similar threads

Back
Top