Should I drop all lab (2nd/3rd year)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 11thHeaven
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drop Lab Year
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics student at the University of Edinburgh contemplating whether to pursue a theoretical stream or continue with experimental courses in their degree. The student expresses a preference for theoretical physics but is concerned about the potential drawbacks of dropping experimental work, such as a lack of understanding of the subject and reduced employability. They recognize the value of transferable skills gained from lab work, including data analysis and practical experience. Additionally, the student seeks advice on whether transitioning from an experimental undergraduate program to a theoretical graduate program is feasible. Ultimately, they are weighing the importance of personal interest in their studies against the potential impact on their future career in physics.
11thHeaven
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
I'm a student of physics at the University of Edinburgh in the UK. I'm going into my third year of a four year bachelors course. I now need to decide whether to continue with an ordinary physics degree or whether to choose the theoretical stream, which involves replacing all remaining experimental courses it with extra maths and theoretical options.

I don't much enjoy lab work, and I am more interested in theoretical physics. However, I can't help feeling dropping experimental work would handicap me both in my understanding of the subject - I see physics as a natural science before anything else - and in my chances to remain in physics post graduation.

In addition, I believe I'd gain more in the way of transferable skills were I to continue with experimental work. Data analysis, the hands on nature of designing and carrying out an experiment and report writing are the things which immediately come to mind. I'd gain more mathematical proficiency if I were to take the theoretical stream, but I don't see that making a difference to a potential employer.

However, I also feel that this is the one time I'll be able to study what most interests me, and that my grades will reflect my enjoyment in what I'm studying. Ultimately, I think that continuing with lab work would be better for me, but maybe less enjoyable.

Could anyone here offer advice on this dilemma? Is it easier to go from an experimental undergrad to a theoretical grad programme than vice versa?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It wouldn't hurt to have at least one solid lab class. Many universities require some kind of senior lab. In undergrad, most of your classes are already theory and lecture, right? There probably isn't a distinction between theoretical and experimental at the undergrad level, so you should try and get some experience in both.
 
Khashishi said:
It wouldn't hurt to have at least one solid lab class. Many universities require some kind of senior lab. In undergrad, most of your classes are already theory and lecture, right? There probably isn't a distinction between theoretical and experimental at the undergrad level, so you should try and get some experience in both.

Where I study, one can choose the theoretical stream, in which case there is no senior lab at all. I've already taken experimental classes this past year.

My question was whether it would be harmful to my future were I to take this route.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top