Should I Fret About Playing the CV Game for a Theoretical Physicist Career?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ice109
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Aspirants of a theoretical physicist career, particularly those focused on modeling theory, must consider the competitive landscape shaped by a surplus of qualified candidates, especially from China. Engaging in traditional CV-building activities may not be as crucial as excelling in coursework and conducting relevant research. The discussion highlights the distinct challenges faced by theorists in various subfields, such as condensed matter and high energy physics. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of having a "Plan B," such as pursuing opportunities in optics, which can provide a pathway into theoretical physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of theoretical physics concepts, particularly Grand Unified Theories (GUTs)
  • Familiarity with the distinctions between condensed matter and high energy physics
  • Knowledge of research methodologies in theoretical physics
  • Awareness of career pathways in optics and experimental research
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the current landscape of theoretical physics job markets and demand
  • Explore opportunities in optics as a viable alternative to theoretical physics
  • Learn about the specific skills required for condensed matter versus high energy physics theorists
  • Investigate effective strategies for building a strong academic CV in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and early-career physicists considering a career in theoretical physics, particularly those interested in modeling theory and seeking alternative pathways through optics.

ice109
Messages
1,707
Reaction score
6
if i want to be a theorist, and not the phenomenologist kind either, but the other kind ( my advisor said modeling theorist, someone who invents the models ). should i be playing the whole bolstering my CV game that everyone played in high school, in an attempt to get into ivys? if i just do well in all of my classes and do research with someone in the field is that enough? in zapper's writeup about what it takes to be a physicist he says that in theory success partly comes from pedigree and this makes me fret.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Given the huge number of very good theorists coming out of China that you'll be directly competing with, I'd be fretting in your shoes. It has been my experience that the supply for theorists outstrips demand - and I mean by more than the average supply already outstrips demand in the academic world. This could definitely promote the cliquishness you are worried about.

However, there is something that deserves clarification. Everyone talks about theory as if it were one area. It isn't - the predicaments of theorists in condensed matter and high energy physics are different, as are many of the skills they use. This goes for theorists in other areas of physics as well.

What do you actually plan on studying?
 
Locrian said:
Given the huge number of very good theorists coming out of China that you'll be directly competing with, I'd be fretting in your shoes. It has been my experience that the supply for theorists outstrips demand - and I mean by more than the average supply already outstrips demand in the academic world. This could definitely promote the cliquishness you are worried about.

However, there is something that deserves clarification. Everyone talks about theory as if it were one area. It isn't - the predicaments of theorists in condensed matter and high energy physics are different, as are many of the skills they use. This goes for theorists in other areas of physics as well.

What do you actually plan on studying?

what every other aspiring theorists plans on studying :-p GUTs
 
Locrian said:
It has been my experience that the supply for theorists outstrips demand - and I mean by more than the average supply already outstrips demand in the academic world.

And this is a long-standing situation. It was definitely like this when I was in grad school about 25 years ago. Anyone planning to do a PhD in theoretical physics should have a "Plan B."
 
Or do what I am doing and attempt to approach fundamental physics through optics. There is plenty of work available for an arbitrary mix of theory and application at any given skill level. It is easy to get an experimental RA position in optics even as an undergrad, and you can smoothly transition to theoretical physics from there. This may not be the quickest way to get money thrown at you to try unifying physics, but it is certainly more doable.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
771
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K