Should I Pursue a Degree in Geophysics or Switch Back to Physics?

[petie320]

Hey everyone, I'm a longtime lurker, first time poster.

I'm currently a second year undergrad student enrolled in BS.c of geophysics with a minor in physics. I'm interested in pursuing a career in geophysics, however, I'm not sure I'm going about it in the best way. The way I see it, I have two options:

1. continue with the BS.c geophysics with minor in physics OR
2. switch majors to experimental physics, and upon graduation specialize into geophysics

My concern with getting an undergrad in geophysics is that there is not as much focus on math and physics courses as there would be in a pure physics degree (I guess that's obvious). Anyone have any opinions on what i should do? I don't want to neglect the fundamental courses, however it seems logical to get a geophysics degree if my intention is to pursue a career in geophysics.

PS. i was originally in experimental physics and only recently switched to geophysics. Switching back would not be hard.

 

[Choppy]

Questions you might want to ask:
- Have graduates of your current geophysics program gone into geophysics graduate school?
- If they have, how successful have they been? (You may want to try contacting some of them. Most grad students are reasonably happy to answer a few polite questions from an undergrad.)
- What courses specifically would you be missing?
- What courses do you get out of the geophysics major that you wouldn't in the experimental physics major?

As a rule of thumb, I generally believe that one should avoid specializing too much in undergrad. Sometimes you can end up with special programs that include 'field overview' type courses that, while interesting, contribute little to your overall education and keep you from learning more valuable stuff. In my experience it also keeps more doors open for longer, should you decide you want to change paths somewhere later along the line.

 

[petie320]

As a rule of thumb, I generally believe that one should avoid specializing too much in undergrad. Sometimes you can end up with special programs that include 'field overview' type courses that, while interesting, contribute little to your overall education and keep you from learning more valuable stuff. In my experience it also keeps more doors open for longer, should you decide you want to change paths somewhere later along the line.

thanks for the response so quick.

I do kind of feel like I'm specializing a bit too soon, maybe it would be wise to stick with a physics degree of some sort for my undegrad. My university offers several types of physics degrees, including an Applied physics degree. I'm not really sure of the difference between experimental and applied physics, but maybe the best choice would be applied physics with a minor in Earth science.

 

[foxfyr]

If you desire to go into a particular field, first look at what professional certifications are required and path to complete this. then be aware that technical fields are being increasingly outsourced or off shored as the technical fields are being commoditized.

Be sure to plan for a SOLID proficiency in business - accounting or finance and also project management - as the real value to a company is not in being a great technician, but in bringing strategic value to the company by understanding how technology can efficiently and effectively add value to the business function.

Go schedule appointments with folks in leadership positions in the fields of interest and find out what they REALLY do and what skills they REALLY need. Don't get caught asking folks in a department whose vested interest is to sell that department.