Should I Pursue Graduate School in Nuclear Engineering or Physics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the decision between pursuing graduate studies in Nuclear Engineering (NE) versus Physics, particularly for a student with a strong interest in nuclear and quantum physics. The participant has experience in hands-on projects, specifically in designing and building instruments for nuclear facilities, which aligns more with NE. Key insights include the importance of selecting graduate schools with strong programs in specific sub-fields of NE, such as reactor design and computational methods, and the evolving role of engineers who are proficient in CAD/CAE tools like SolidWorks, which integrate design and analysis functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Nuclear Engineering sub-fields (reactor design, materials, medical applications)
  • Familiarity with CAD/CAE software, specifically SolidWorks
  • Knowledge of numerical analysis and programming
  • Awareness of industry demands in mechanical and core design engineering
NEXT STEPS
  • Research graduate programs with strong Nuclear Engineering departments focusing on power generation from fission
  • Explore the integration of CAD/CAE tools in engineering design and analysis
  • Investigate current industry demands for skills in mechanical design and core design engineering
  • Examine research areas related to nuclear power generation and its applications
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for undergraduate students in physics or engineering considering graduate school, professionals in the nuclear field, and anyone interested in the intersection of theoretical physics and practical engineering applications.

DukeLuke
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
I'm a physics and math student one year away from finishing my undergraduate degrees. I've taken plenty of classes but found I'm most interested in nuclear and quantum physics. Graduate school in physics has been the plan since the start, but I'm beginning to think nuclear engineering might fit my interests/personality better. I think this because while I do find the physics side of things very interesting I enjoy the application of the science more than the "fundamental physics" type research. This summer I had the chance to work at a national lab where I designed, modeled, and built an instrument for a nuclear facility. I really enjoyed the opportunity to create something that fixes a unique problem. I prefer this to previous physics research I have done involving physics experiments. I think the main reason for this is my hands-on personality. I enjoy building/fixing things and always have more projects going than I have time for (thanks to coursework).

My understanding of graduate school is that it is much more focused than undergraduate. For this reason I've been given the advice to apply to schools that are strong in the nuclear sub-field (reactor design, materials, medical, space, computation, ...) I would want a career in. I think my current skill-set is geared more towards the computational side of things (I have a strong numerical analysis/programming background), but I'm worried if I go this route I miss out on design and the chance to come up with solutions to technical/mechanical problems. So I guess you could say that I'm undecided on what sub-field I'm most interested in, and because of this I'm having a difficult time deciding which graduate schools to apply to.

Here's my questions:
Are computer modeling and design usually separate tasks, or is it common for a NE to be involved in both?
What are some ways to determine how strong a graduate school is in a certain area?
What skills are/will be in demand in industry?
Can you recommend any research areas based on my interests?

I know these questions may be too broad based on the diversity of the NE field. If it helps I'm most interested in power generation from fission. I can also clarify if you have any questions, I'm just worried if I make this post any longer no one will read it. Thanks for reading, any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Computer modeling is more along the lines of analysis, and design is usually a separate function.

Designers may not necessarily be involved in the analysis part. While that might have been generally true in the past, that may have changed or is changing, because now we see a lot of CAD/CAE applications.

Whereas in the past, a designer may pass of a 3D model to an engineer to analyze, programs like SolidWorks have CAE imbedded in them.

An engineer who is proficient in CAD/CAE, and knows mechanics and materials, will certainly find abundant opportunities.

In nuclear, there is demand for proficient engineers in core design as well as mechanical design, and generally there is more work in mechanical design than core design, since the core is a relatively small part of an entire plant.

Plants require mechanical engineers, structural/civil engineers, electrical engineers, and various other disciplines.

Keep one's eyes on this - http://www.ornl.gov/ornlhome/b_roll/casl.shtml
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K