Should I study Analysis before Linear Algebra?

Click For Summary
Reading a proofs book is not essential before studying linear algebra, as a solid introductory book on linear algebra with proofs can suffice. Many find linear algebra easier than analysis, although some analysis texts may require knowledge of linear algebra concepts like n-tuples and vector norms. Certain analysis books can be independent of linear algebra, focusing instead on single-variable calculus theory. Recommended resources include "Understanding Analysis" by Abbot for analysis and "Linear Algebra Done Right" by Axler for linear algebra. While reading a proofs book can be beneficial for those unfamiliar with proofs, it is not a strict requirement.
terrytosh
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Or is reading a proofs book enough
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you don't need to study analysis before linear algebra.

And if you get a good introductory book on LA (with proofs!) then there is no need to first read a "proofs book", either. In fact, I think such a book on LA would make for a good "proofs book" by itself.
 
terrytosh said:
Or is reading a proofs book enough
Linear Algebra, at least for me, was easier than analysis.

Depending on the analysis book you choose to study from. It may require a bit of background from linear algebra. Ie., what is an n-tuple , norm of a vector , and some other topics.

Or the analysis book can be independent of linear algebra. Ie., it is a review of single-variable calculus, but now you work through the theory of it.

A very good intro analysis book is Understanding Analysis by Abbot.
A good Linear Algebra (theory) is Linear Algebra Done Right by Axler.

You do not necessarily need to read a proofs book, but it does not hurt to read one. Especially if you are not familiar proofs.

A good proof method book is by Hammok. A pdf of the book can be legally downloaded.
 
Given the current funding situation, you should contact potential departments or research groups before you apply and pay any application fees. Many programs are not taking new graduate students at all this cycle because of funding uncertainty, unless a specific advisor can show they already have money to support you for five years. This is what I’ve heard directly from 20–30 programs. Do not waste money applying blindly.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K