Should I Switch Degrees to Pursue Nanotech Research?

  • Context: Physics 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jonnyb42
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Switch
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision of whether to switch from an Electrical Engineering degree to a Physics degree, with a focus on pursuing research in nanotechnology and molecular manufacturing. Participants explore the implications of such a switch on job availability and research opportunities in both fields.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to switch to physics to better prepare for research in nanotechnology, while also noting a strong interest in both fields.
  • Another participant provides a link to employment statistics for physicists, suggesting that there are viable career paths for physics graduates.
  • Concerns are raised about the workload and GPA implications of pursuing both a physics major and a minor in nanotechnology.
  • Some participants question the assumption that one cannot combine engineering and physics, highlighting interdisciplinary fields that integrate both areas.
  • A participant expresses a dislike for experimental physics, questioning the nature of research in government labs and expressing a preference for theoretical work.
  • There is a discussion about the suitability of an undergraduate degree in engineering versus physics for a career in molecular manufacturing, with an emphasis on the interdisciplinary nature of the field.
  • One participant advises against letting negative articles influence the decision to pursue a career in science, suggesting that the information may be outdated.
  • A later post indicates that the original poster has decided to switch to a physics major, thanking the community for their input.
  • Another participant expresses curiosity about the job positions of those in the discussion, particularly in relation to government or military work.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best path forward, as there are multiple competing views regarding the value of a physics versus an engineering degree for careers in nanotechnology and molecular manufacturing. Concerns about workload and personal preferences also contribute to the lack of agreement.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the potential for confusion regarding the nature of research roles and the distinction between experimental and theoretical physics. There are also references to outdated information regarding job prospects in science, which may not reflect current realities.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering a switch between engineering and physics degrees, particularly those interested in nanotechnology and interdisciplinary research fields.

Jonnyb42
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am having a lot of trouble deciding if I should switch to a physics degree or not.
I am currently in Electrical Engineering, about to finish my second semester, (first year.)
My thoughts on switching to physics having nothing to do with a dislike towards engineering, I very much like it.
I want to do research, particularly in nanotechnology, so I thought it might be better to switch to a physics major, (I am also interested in physics as a subject, so I don't just think I SHOULD do it.)
It might be important to mention, that regardless of what I do, I am taking an available minor in Nanotech at my school.

The only reasons I am doubting the switch is because of web pages such as http://sciencejobs.blogspot.com/" .
There, the author says a Ph.D. is a perilous path... (I refer to the posts near the bottom, especially the last post.)
Another negative and depressing article is http://wuphys.wustl.edu/~katz/scientist.html" .

I would love to get a Ph.D. in physics however by what I am reading it is not so good.
So I thought that it might be good to do physics bachelor's, and master in materials science & engineering, or perhaps apply to a more advanced engineering graduate school elsewhere.

Could anyone suggest if I should switch majors based on research in nanotech? (and research in general) as well as if I will get screwed over and end up on the streets.
My understanding is that a physics undergraduate would leave me with stronger scientific background for pursuing nanotechnology research.

I love engineering and physics alike, so it is not a matter of "follow your heart,"
I am mainly asking in terms of job availibility and research availability.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
OK, two things:

1. Check out this link.

http://www.aip.org/statistics/trends/emptrends.html

It should tell you as much as one can know about the employment statistics of physicists in the US.

2. I always am amazed why people think that they can't do both engineering and physics at the same time. Do people think that physicists are only people doing theory and work in String/elementary particle/etc.? I've already written this in another thread as a glaring example of an field of study that essentially is a combination of both physics and engineering:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=410271

This is just one example. Fields of study such as device/detector/instrumentation physics is another such field in which engineering and physics definitely combined very well. One might have a very good guess on the employability of someone graduating with THAT degree and that set of skills.

Zz.
 
I always am amazed why people think that they can't do both engineering and physics at the same time.
I dont' think that at all. I just think, with my minor, it would be too much. I am worried my GPA would be adversely affected.

Basically, what job opportunities are there for physics majors, and what research opportunities are there for engineering majors?

I HATE experimental physics, so I am now curious, is that what happens in government research labs... data gathering, plotting, etc??
I like theoretical physics. Gathering data is not my idea of physics.

The type of research I want to do involves some engineering. Building a prototype of something for example. I hope you know what I mean.

thanks for any help
 
Last edited:
Jonnyb42 said:
I dont' think that at all. I just think, with my minor, it would be too much. I am worried my GPA would be adversely affected.

Basically, what job opportunities are there for physics majors, and what research opportunities are there for engineering majors?

I HATE experimental physics, so I am now curious, is that what happens in government research labs... data gathering, plotting, etc??
I like theoretical physics. Gathering data is not my idea of physics.

The type of research I want to do involves some engineering. Building a prototype of something for example. I hope you know what I mean.

thanks for any help

That is the most confusing post I've ever read. First you ask what job opportunities there are for physics majors after someone posted the link to the very source of what physicists get jobs in. Then you say you hate experimental physics but want to do something that involves engineering... :confused:
 
I am sorry for the confusion. Perhaps I should simplify my question. I know exactly what I want to do, but I don't know how to get there:

I want to research in molecular manufacturing. Which undergraduate degree is most suitable for such a pursuit: engineering or physics.

I emphasize undergraduate because I am willing and able to do graduate studies.
 
Jonnyb42 said:
I am sorry for the confusion. Perhaps I should simplify my question. I know exactly what I want to do, but I don't know how to get there:

You said you have finished the second semester. Assuming your program is 8 semesters long, I seriously doubt if you done any engineering at all. If undergrad programs are run the same way they were 4 years ago, you are probably wading through Griffiths E&M, some vector calculus, circuit theory, maybe some machining (?) and some linear algebra or contour integration which may seem really cool.

So how do you know that you "hate" experimental physics? A lot of experimental physics involves engineering, and a lot of engineering involves physics (especially these days). ZapperZ's thread (and the associated links) should answer a lot of your questions.

Oh and by the way, simply getting an engineering degree will not make you necessarily better employable or better off in any way than a physics graduate. You have to work hard.

I want to research in molecular manufacturing. Which undergraduate degree is most suitable for such a pursuit: engineering or physics.

I emphasize undergraduate because I am willing and able to do graduate studies.

Unfortunately I don't know what molecular manufacturing really is, though I guess you are referring to nanotechnology, which is interdisciplinary, but probably involves more chem, materials and biology people than anyone else. Of course there are a LOT of physicists, EEs, MEs involved.

EE is a very versatile program. But if you're somehow damn sure that you hate something, then stay away from it! Do what makes you happy. Stop reading horror stories and depressing articles. Katz's article was written in 1999. Even the monetary figures he quotes are off by factors of 2 or 3 :-). If his logic is to be used as a guiding principle, then nobody who is smart and rational enough should be doing science. Do you see something wrong there? Incidentally, very few folks from the golden era of particle physics have nice things to say about present day science and society.
 
I have switched to physics major!

Thank you everyone for your responses.
I appreciate ALL your responses.

Jonny
 
Jonnyb42 said:
I have switched to physics major!

Thank you everyone for your responses.
I appreciate ALL your responses.

Jonny

Well that was quick. =) Good luck on your decision.
 
Yeah that first link is extremely helpful, thank you ZapperZ.
Out of curiosity, what is you guys' job positions if I may ask?
I am particularly curious if anyone works/has worked for the government/military.
Also, what would working in the DoD be categorized as, out of the positions http://www.aip.org/statistics/trends/reports/emp2010.pdf"?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
15K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K