Is Artin's Algebra Book Suitable for Beginners?

AI Thread Summary
Artin's Algebra book can be challenging for students without prior experience in proof-based mathematics beyond calculus. It is advisable to complete at least an introductory proof-based course before tackling Abstract Algebra. Essential prerequisites include understanding mathematical induction, properties of integers, modular mathematics, equivalence relations, and functions. Familiarity with these concepts is crucial for success in a first course in abstract algebra. Additionally, taking a Linear Algebra class prior to Abstract Algebra is recommended, as it provides concrete applications and introduces abstract ideas, enhancing the understanding of non-commutative multiplication and proof techniques.
jaejoon89
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
How hard is Artin's Algebra book to understand? For a student who has not had any upper level (proof based) math classes beyond calculus, is it doable if you are sufficiently motivated?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
it's recommended (and most likely mandatory) to have some short of proof based course (even be it just an introductory course) before taking Abstract Algebra.

for basic (first course) in abstract algebra, you'll need following:

- mathematical induction (along with proof by contradiction)
- basic properties of integers: well ordering principle, division algorithm, notion of gcd, fundamental theorem of arithmetic
- understanding of
- modular mathematics
- equivalence relations (along with partition)
- functions/mapping

if you are not familiar with 1/2 of the listed above, take a introductory proof based course first.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521597188/?tag=pfamazon01-20 is a good book for selective self-study as well as detailed reading.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I suggest you take a Linear Algebra class and then Abstract Algebra. The linear algebra class has more concrete application and introduces some of the more abstract ideas such as non-commutative multiplication (AB not equal to BA). Also you'll get some experience with proofs. I'd recommend you take them back to back.
 
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
7K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Back
Top