Should Intelligent Design Be Taught Alongside Evolution in Science Classes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Frozenoak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    English Homework
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether intelligent design should be taught alongside evolution in science classes. The original poster seeks published debates on the topic for an essay but struggles to find suitable sources. Suggestions include accessing college databases and specific articles from major publications that address the issue. The poster acknowledges the difficulty in finding a comprehensive debate but decides to take a more straightforward approach by using readily available articles. The conversation highlights the challenges of sourcing balanced perspectives on the topic for academic purposes.
Frozenoak
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Write an essay explaining opposing positions. I have selected from a list the issue of "Should intelligent design be taught in science classes as an alternative theory to evolution?"


Homework Equations



I discussed the paper with my professor and he said that "if I could find one" I could write my essay on a published debate of the issue.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have searched via Google for the key words Debate, Published, Written, Intelligent design, and Evolution. I haven't been able to find anything that looks like the statement/response type debate I was hoping for. I am here to see if someone can help guide me in the correct direction.

Regards,
dale
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well I have access to my college databases which have tons of different articles and journals. Unfortunately I have no way to give you access to it but I can tell you where some were published so you can look in the archives. Here are a few articles, but you have to try and get them yourselves through the website archives.

'Intelligent design' about faith, not science" USA TODAY, December 7, 2005

Intelligent Design Might Be Meeting Its Maker" The New York Times, December 4, 2005

Debate on intelligent design becomes a clash of rights Those who want it taught cite free speech; opponents see wrongful religion use. Philadelphia Inquirer, November 2, 2005

Hope this helps.
 
While not exactly what I was looking for your suggestions certainly cements my suspicions that it would be hard to find a full debate published. I think the easiest and, more importantly, quickest thing for me to do is take the first article supporting each side I can find via Google. Thanks for the help but I think I will have to do the leg work myself on this. I am still open to directions towards a site that publishes debates but I am taking the quick/easy route on this paper. It is for English 101 after all.

Regards,
dale
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top