Should only smart people get to use guns?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Containment
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the controversial idea of restricting gun ownership based on intelligence, specifically through an IQ test requirement. The original poster questions whether smarter individuals are less likely to carry guns, suggesting that high intelligence might correlate with avoiding dangerous situations. Concerns are raised about the practicality and implications of such a policy, including the potential for a black market in firearms and whether intelligence correlates with responsible gun ownership. The conversation also touches on the broader implications of banning guns entirely, with some arguing that such restrictions would unfairly disadvantage law-abiding citizens while criminals would continue to evade the law. The notion that intelligence does not equate to mental stability is highlighted, referencing individuals like the Unabomber as examples of high IQ individuals who committed violent acts. Overall, the thread explores the complexities and ethical considerations surrounding gun ownership and regulation based on intelligence.
Containment
Thinking about a recent case that's in the news lately got me thinking about gun bans. I am personally a right to own gun person however I found myself pondering the idea that only smart people should be allowed to use guns. I was thinking if I was going to ban guns I would ban them in such a way that only people with very high intelligence scores could use them. So basically in order to get a gun you would have to take an IQ test and score in the top percentile. Well that's unlikely but then it got me to thinking do smart people pack heat? You got to think if a person is smart enough they should be able to avoid situations where they need guns most of the time so carrying a gun around would prove to be more of a pain in the you know what for the most part.

Is it really true that "smart" people don't arm them self's in public? Would requiring people to pass an IQ test to use guns cause a massive surge in the gun sales blackmarket? And would you accept it if you were in the IQ bracket that did not allow for gun ownership?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you think this would stop people like Anders Breivik?
 
Why are people with high iqs more trust worthy with guns?
 
An IQ test has NOTHING to do with mental stability. The unibomber was reportedly quite a bright guy.
 
Containment said:
And would you accept it if you were in the IQ bracket that did not allow for gun ownership?

Some might argue that this IQ bracket is, in fact, the high one.

More generally, how about NOBODY is allowed to own guns? If the counter-argument is that this would disadvantage law-abiding folk because the criminals will ignore the ban, then the consequence of your suggestion is that only smart peoiple should be allowed the claimed-for defence of guns.

Not really the sort of society I'd want to live in.
 
This thread does not meet the minimum requirements to post in this section. Please be sure to read both sets of rules stickied at the top of the Philosphy forum. Rules must be followed when posting.
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top