Should we question the existence of a why?

  • Thread starter csmcmillion
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discussed the validity of the questions "why" and "what" and whether they are fallacious. The argument was made that these questions rely on causality, which only applies within our universe. Therefore, they may not be valid questions outside of our universe or in other universes. The conversation also addressed the existence of a supernatural creator and the concept of space and time.
  • #1
csmcmillion
63
2
Is there a "why"?

Please comment on my argument that "why" and "what" may not be valid questions:

> My reference to the basic laws of nature, together with physical constants, simply raises the question of why?

Who says there must be a _why_?

> Probability aside, an inner voice calls out important questions: Why are we here? What is on the other side?

Agreed. However, I think they may be fallacious questions. Consider that such questions as why... and what... are premised on causality, which is premised on the existence of space/time itself. Whether one assumes the existence of a supernatural creator, or just sticks to cosmology/cosmogony, we have to bear in mind (IMHO) that space/time are constructs that apply only within our universe, only after its creation. Presuming space/time does not exist outside our universe (although it may exist in other universes) questions such as "why is it here", "why are we here", "what's outside", "where did it come from", etc. likely aren't valid questions; they make no sense outside of a space/time continuum that underpins the very concept of causality.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


If you know the question may be fallacious then why do you ask?
 
  • #3

1. Is there a reason for everything?

As a scientist, I can say that there is not always a clear reason or purpose behind everything. While many things in the natural world can be explained through scientific principles and processes, there are also many mysteries that we have yet to understand. Additionally, some things may occur randomly or by chance, without a specific reason or purpose.

2. Can science explain everything?

Science is a powerful tool for understanding the natural world, but it does have its limitations. There are some things that may be beyond the scope of scientific explanation, such as questions about morality or spirituality. Additionally, as our understanding of science is constantly evolving, there may be phenomena that we have yet to fully explain.

3. Is there a scientific explanation for the existence of the universe?

There are various scientific theories and hypotheses about the origins of the universe, such as the Big Bang theory. However, as the universe is vast and complex, there may never be a complete and definitive explanation for its existence. It is an ongoing area of research and exploration in the scientific community.

4. Is there a purpose to life?

This is a philosophical question that can have many different interpretations and answers. From a scientific perspective, life may have originated through natural processes and evolved over time. However, the concept of purpose is subjective and can vary depending on individual beliefs and perspectives.

5. Does everything happen for a reason?

Again, this question can have different meanings and interpretations. In terms of scientific explanations, events and occurrences may have underlying causes and reasons, but they may not always be evident or easy to understand. It is also important to consider that some things may happen randomly or by chance, without a specific reason or purpose.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • New Member Introductions
Replies
3
Views
92
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
665
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
553
Back
Top