Should We Stop Eating Foods with Unique DNA Fingerprints?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DavidSnider
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Genetics Weird
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around Kathy Ireland's stance on abortion, which is based on the idea that each individual has a unique DNA fingerprint from the moment of conception. This leads to a contemplation of genetic permutations and whether a person's genome can be fully represented by their parents' DNA. It is clarified that due to genetic recombination during gamete formation, not all potential siblings' genomes can be derived solely from parental DNA. The conversation touches on the uniqueness of DNA in various living organisms, including cancer cells and mitochondria. A sarcastic argument is made regarding the implications of Ireland's rationale, suggesting that if unique DNA fingerprints confer rights, it would extend to all living things, including the food we consume, thus questioning the consistency of her position on the sanctity of life. The discussion highlights the complexities of genetic identity and the ethical considerations surrounding abortion and consumption.
DavidSnider
Gold Member
Messages
511
Reaction score
147
I was just reading some story about how Kathy Ireland is opposed to abortion because at the moment of conception they have a 'DNA Fingerprint'. Abortion issue aside, it got me to wonder:

If I sequenced my mother and father's DNA and generated all the 2^23 permutations of chromosomes would my genome, my siblings and all my potential siblings be in there? (Assuming no mutations or naughty milkmen).
 
Last edited:
Biology news on Phys.org
No. During the generation of gamete cells, there can be recombination between homologous chromosomes generating chromosomes that contain some segments of DNA from one chromosome and some segments from it's homologous pair. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromosomal_crossover

Food for thought: cancer cells in your body would also have a unique DNA fingerprint.
 
Ygggdrasil said:
Food for thought: cancer cells in your body would also have a unique DNA fingerprint.
As does your mitochondria.
 
mgb_phys said:
As does your mitochondria.

I'm no so sure.. mine looks a lot like my mom's.
 
alxm said:
I'm no so sure.. mine looks a lot like my mom's.

Doh - sorry I was thinking of having different DNA in you, not the original question.
 
DavidSnider said:
..is opposed to abortion because at the moment of conception they have a [unique] 'DNA Fingerprint'.
Ygggdrasil said:
During the generation of gamete cells, there can be recombination
So her argument is that every individual sperm cell has a human right to be nurtured through to adulthood, but not each identical twin?
 
Last edited:
Every living organism has a "DNA fingerprint." Does that mean I shouldn't eat my carrots either, because they each have a unique DNA fingerprint?
 
Moonbear said:
Every living organism has a "DNA fingerprint." Does that mean I shouldn't eat my carrots either, because they each have a unique DNA fingerprint?

I'm not sure I fully understand the question, but if you're asking whether if it's unsafe to eat carrots due to their unique DNA fingerprint, you have to keep in mind that there are unique DNA fingerprints in a lot of things you eat. If not, then every piece of food you eat. Meats, vegetables, nuts, fruits and everything in between all have their own genetic material in their cells.
 
  • #10
Zen2 said:
I'm not sure I fully understand the question, but if you're asking whether if it's unsafe to eat carrots due to their unique DNA fingerprint, you have to keep in mind that there are unique DNA fingerprints in a lot of things you eat. If not, then every piece of food you eat. Meats, vegetables, nuts, fruits and everything in between all have their own genetic material in their cells.

I was being sarcastic. Kathy Ireland's rationale was that having a unique DNA fingerprint meant that a "life" should be preserved (i.e., no abortion), so by that same logic, one should avoid all foods that need to be killed to consume them, since they all contain a unique DNA fingerprint (maybe the GM corn is okay, since they aren't so unique). I was just using sarcasm to point out the flaws in the argument.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top