Show a function has at most one Root (IVT & Rolles [quick question])

  • Thread starter Thread starter LucasCLarson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Root
LucasCLarson
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
show x^3-15x+c=0 has at most one root on the interval [-2, 2].

My work/attempted solution.

Using the IVT i determined that there is a possible root (N=c) within the interval of [-2,2]. because c is my constant i decided to Use [d] as my letter for explanation.

f(x)=x^3-15x+c
f(d)=d^3-15d+c
0=d^3-15d+c
-c=d^3-15d
f(-2)=22=-c
c=-22 when for f(-2)
f(2)=-22=-c
c=22 for f(2)

f is continuous on [-2,2] because it is a polynomial. Let -c be a number b/w f(-2) and f(2) where f(-2) does not equal f(2). Then there exist a root d on (-2,2) such that F(d)=-c

I am stuck there. I feel like i have done a bunch of stuff wrong so a little nudge in the right direction would be great.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hard to follow what you are doing especially when not using LaTex (in fact I'm not sure you are doing anything :biggrin:).

However, just ask yourself where are the turning points (the maximum and minimum) of your polynomial and you will soon see.

When they told you 'Rolle's Theorem' they were pretty well telling you that.
 
LucasCLarson said:
show x^3-15x+c=0 has at most one root on the interval [-2, 2].

My work/attempted solution.

Using the IVT i determined that there is a possible root (N=c) within the interval of [-2,2]. because c is my constant i decided to Use [d] as my letter for explanation.

f(x)=x^3-15x+c
f(d)=d^3-15d+c
0=d^3-15d+c
-c=d^3-15d
f(-2)=22=-c
c=-22 when for f(-2)
"when for f(-2)"? f(-2)= c+ 22, not "22= -c".

f(2)=-22=-c
c=22 for f(2)
f(2)= 8- 30+ c= c- 22. That does not say c= 22 unless you are assuming f(2)= 0- which you have no right to assume.

f is continuous on [-2,2] because it is a polynomial. Let -c be a number b/w f(-2) and f(2) where f(-2) does not equal f(2). Then there exist a root d on (-2,2) such that F(d)=-c
Don't use "c" to mean two different things. Did you mean d? But f(d)= -c is not f(d)= 0 which is what you want.

I am stuck there. I feel like i have done a bunch of stuff wrong so a little nudge in the right direction would be great.

Thanks
You cannot prove that x3- 15x2+ c= 0 has a root in [-2, 2] because it is not true: x3- 15x+ 50= 0 has NO roots in that interval. And you are only asked to prove that there are not MORE than one root.

Rolle's theorem, which you mention in your title, says that if there are two points at which f(x)= 0, then there must be an x between them where f'(x)= 0. Look at the derivative of f, not f.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top