Show mapping is an automorphism

  • Thread starter Thread starter math_nerd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mapping
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the mapping Phi(a+bi) = a-bi is an automorphism of the group of complex numbers under addition. Participants clarify that the mapping must be shown to be one-to-one, onto, and operation-preserving. It is established that if Phi(a+bi) = Phi(c+di), then a must equal c and b must equal d, confirming the mapping is one-to-one. Additionally, it is confirmed that for any element in the group, the mapping produces an element in the group, demonstrating that it is onto. The proof's logic is refined, emphasizing that introducing extra variables is unnecessary for establishing the properties of the mapping.
math_nerd
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Show that the mapping Phi(a+bi)=a-bi is an automorphism of the group of complex numbers under addition.

I have this as of now:

Let (c+di) and (a+bi) be elements in group G.

1) phi(a+bi) is function phi from G to G, by assumption. Therefore the function is a mapping.

2) 1-1: assume that phi(a+bi) = phi (c+di), so a-bi = c-di.
Then, how can I show that this somehow equals a+bi = c+di?

3) onto: phi is onto if for every element g' in G, we can find an element g in G, s.t. Phi(g)=g'. So phi(a+bi) = c-di. Where c-di is an element in G(?). With some arithmetic, I got phi(a+bi) = a-bi= c+di.

4) addition is preserved, by showing phi(a+bi+c+di) = phi(a+bi) + phi(c+di) is true.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For part 2, a+bi=c+di only if the real parts are equal and the imaginary parts are also equal, yes? a,b,c and d are real. Doesn't that mean a=c and b=d?
 
So for part 2, I can say that a-bi=c-di, so a=c and b=d must be true for a-bi=c-di. This then implies a+bi=c+di is true.

Also, is rest of the proof right?
 
math_nerd said:
So for part 2, I can say that a-bi=c-di, so a=c and b=d must be true for a-bi=c-di. This then implies a+bi=c+di is true.

Also, is rest of the proof right?

The phrasing on the rest of it is pretty vague. I just responded to the only part you had a '?' on. Why don't you detail a little more exactly what your question is? Focus on one part at a time.
 
Last edited:
So I need to show that the mapping Phi(a+bi)=a-bi is an automorphism of the group of complex numbers under addition. The way I have proved it is to show that it is a mapping (we are given this piece of information), the mapping is 1-1 and onto, and the operation is preserved. Also, I assumed that g=a+bi and g'=c+di, where g,g' are some elements in the group, G. What looks vague about it?
 
math_nerd said:
So I need to show that the mapping Phi(a+bi)=a-bi is an automorphism of the group of complex numbers under addition. The way I have proved it is to show that it is a mapping (we are given this piece of information), the mapping is 1-1 and onto, and the operation is preserved. Also, I assumed that g=a+bi and g'=c+di, where g,g' are some elements in the group, G. What looks vague about it?


So I have to show group G maps to itself.
 
math_nerd said:
So I need to show that the mapping Phi(a+bi)=a-bi is an automorphism of the group of complex numbers under addition. The way I have proved it is to show that it is a mapping (we are given this piece of information), the mapping is 1-1 and onto, and the operation is preserved. Also, I assumed that g=a+bi and g'=c+di, where g,g' are some elements in the group, G. What looks vague about it?

Nothing if the parts you aren't showing are ok. Like "So phi(a+bi) = c-di. Where c-di is an element in G(?). With some arithmetic, I got phi(a+bi) = a-bi= c+di.". I'm not sure what that means and I'm not sure what part of this you are having problem with.
 
I want to know if the way I have choose g'=c-di and g=a+bi to be two elements in G is written with the correct logic?

For the part I said I did the arithmetic, I did incorrectly.
I want to prove the mapping from G to G is onto.
So I need to show that phi(a+bi)= c+di. How?
 
math_nerd said:
I want to know if the way I have choose g'=c-di and g=a+bi to be two elements in G is written with the correct logic?

For the part I said I did the arithmetic, I did incorrectly.
I want to prove the mapping from G to G is onto.
So I need to show that phi(a+bi)= c+di. How?

Pick any element of G and call it a+bi. a-bi is also in G. phi(a-bi)=a+bi. So a+bi is in the range of phi and it's onto. There's no need to introduce a 'c' and 'd'.
 
  • #10
Okay thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K