Show PE to KE change in closed system is independent of initial velocity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion demonstrates that the change from potential energy to kinetic energy in a closed system is independent of the inertial frame of reference. Using a compressed massless spring as an example, the conservation of momentum and energy equations are derived, showing that the total kinetic energy change (ΔE) remains consistent regardless of the frame of reference. The mathematical proof utilizes Galilean transformations to establish that the relationship ΔU + ΔK = 0 holds true in both stationary and moving frames.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newtonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with conservation laws (momentum and energy)
  • Knowledge of Galilean transformations
  • Basic proficiency in algebra and calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of conservation of momentum in closed systems
  • Learn about Galilean transformations and their applications in physics
  • Explore the relationship between potential and kinetic energy in various mechanical systems
  • Investigate advanced topics in classical mechanics, such as non-inertial frames
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in the principles of energy conservation and frame of reference in closed systems.

rcgldr
Homework Helper
Messages
8,948
Reaction score
687
Because of the kinetic energy and frames of reference thread:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=534883

I was wondering how to show that a change from potential to kinetic energy in a closed system is independent of the (inertial) frame of reference. I think the math below demonstrates this.

Example closed system: a compressed massless spring with potential energy ΔE and two masses. The compressed spring is released and accelerates the two masses, increasing the mechanical energy of the closed system by ΔE.

From frame of reference of the center of mass

m1 = mass 1
m2 = mass 2
v1 = final velocity of mass 1 wrt center of mass
v2 = final velocity of mass 2 wrt center of mass

It's a closed system so momentum is conserved

m1 v1 + m2 v2 = 0

total kinetic energy change in system

ΔE = 1/2 m1 v12 + 1/2 m2 v22

With the center of mass moving with respect to some inertial frame of reference:

v0 = velocity center of mass wrt frame
va = v1 + v0 = final velocity of mass 1 wrt frame
vb = v2 + v0 = final velocity of mass 2 wrt frame

It's a closed system so momentum is conserved

m1 va + m2 vb = (m1 + m2) v0

total kinetic energy change in system

ΔE = 1/2 m1 va2 + 1/2 m2 vb2 - 1/2 (m1 + m2) v02

ΔE = 1/2 m1 (v1 + v0)2 + 1/2 m2 (v2 + v0)2 - 1/2 (m1 + m2) v02

ΔE = 1/2 m1 (v12 + 2 v1 v0 + v02) + 1/2 m2 (v22 + 2 v2 v0 + v02) - 1/2 (m1 + m2) v02

ΔE = 1/2 m1 (v12 + 2 v1 v0) + 1/2 m2 (v22 + 2 v2 v0)

ΔE = 1/2 m1 v12 + 1/2 m2 v22 + m1 v1 v0 + m2 v2 v0

going back to momentum equation:

m1 va + m2 vb - (m1 + m2) v0 = 0

m1 (v1 + v0) + m2 (v2 + v0) - (m1 + m2) v0 = 0

m1 v1 + m2 v2 = 0

m1 v1 v0 + m2 v2 v0 = 0

ΔE = 1/2 m1 v12 + 1/2 m2 v22
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You showed that this works for the specific case of two masses connected with a compressed spring. You need to show that if ##\Delta U +\Delta K =0## in inertial frame of reference ##O## is true, then it is also true in inertial frame ##O'## that is moving with constant velocity ##u## relative to ##O##. This is how to do it in one dimension; it can be easily extended to three dimensions. The Galilean transformations are$$x'=x-ut~\rightarrow~dx'=dx-udt;~~v'=v-ut.$$Let ##F_c## be the sum of all conservative forces acting on the mass. The change in potential energy is the negative of the work done by the conservative forces. In the unprimed frame we have, $$\Delta U=-\int F_c dx~~\mathrm{and} ~~\Delta K=\frac{1}{2} m \left( v_f^2-v_i^2 \right)$$so that$$0=\Delta U +\Delta K=-\int F_c dx+\frac{1}{2} m \left( v_f^2-v_i^2 \right).$$Similarly,$$\Delta U'=-\int F_c dx'=-\int F_c (dx-udt)=-\int F_c dx+u\int F_cdt=\Delta U+uJ~~~~~(1)$$where ##J=\int F_cdt## is the impulse delivered to the mass. Also,$$\Delta K'=\frac{1}{2}m\left({v'}_f^2-{v'}_i^2 \right)=\frac{1}{2}m\left[(v_f-u)^2-(v_i-u)^2 \right]=\frac{1}{2}m\left[v_f^2-v_i^2-2u(v_f-v_i) \right]$$ $$\Delta K'=\frac{1}{2}m\left(v_f^2-v_i^2 \right) -mu\Delta v=\Delta K-uJ~~~~~(2)$$Adding equations (1) and (2) gives the desired result,$$\Delta U' +\Delta K' =\Delta U +\Delta K=0.$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nasu

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K