Show Set is Bounded: Prove A is Bounded in Q

  • Thread starter Thread starter sinClair
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bounded Set
sinClair
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone. I'm a math student still learning to do
proofs. Here is a problem I encountered that seems easy but
has me stuck.

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known
data

Let a be a positive rational number. Let A = {x e Q (that
is, e is an element of the rationals) | x^2 < a}. Show that
A is bounded in Q. Find the least upper bound in R of this
set.

Homework Equations


None.

The Attempt at a Solution


So I want to show that there exists an M such that x < or =
to M for all x in A.
So for all x in A, x^2<a.
=> x < (a/x) if x>0 or x > (a/x) if x < 0
So it seems like I find an upper bound for x if x is
positive and a lower bound for x if x is negative but what
havn't acounted for the other cases.

Thanks for your help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It does not suffice to find an individual bound for all the elements of A. You must find ONE bound that fits ALL the elements of A.

I suggest you treat the two cases a< or =1 and a>1 and find a bound for A is both cases.
 
So the set seems to be bounded by -1,1 if a<1 and sqrt(a) and -sqrt(a) if a>1. But I got this through taking square roots, which arn't there when x is an element of the rationals.

Hm, I guess I have to think about this some more.
 
why not just use a if a>1 ?
 
Notice that you are also asked to find the least upper bound in R. That should be obvious.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top