Show that a distance preserving map T:X->X is onto

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ratpigeon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Map
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that a distance preserving map \( T: X \to X \) is onto, given that \( X \) is compact. The original poster has successfully shown that the map is one-to-one but is struggling with the onto aspect.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various hints and approaches, including considering the minimum distance from a point not in \( T(X) \) to points in \( T(X) \), and the implications of compactness on boundedness and convergence of sequences. There is also mention of covering \( X \) with open balls and the consequences of removing a ball containing a point from \( T(X) \).

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different hints and interpretations. Some have expressed uncertainty about the direction of the hints provided, and there is a recognition of potential contradictions arising from the properties of compactness and distance preservation.

Contextual Notes

There is a hint suggesting to consider points in \( X \setminus T(X) \) and the implications of compactness on sequences. The original poster is also navigating through the consequences of removing open balls from the covering of \( X \).

Ratpigeon
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm trying to show that a distance preserving map is 1:1 and onto. The 1:1 part was easy, but I'm stuck on proving it's onto...

Homework Equations



X is compact
T(X)\subseteqX
THere's a hint saying to consider a point y in X\T(X) and consider the minimum distance
between y and x\in T(X) (the infinum of d(x,y) for all x\in T(X) where d is an undefined metric, and call it deltA)
Then it says to consider the sequence
yn=Tn(y)

The Attempt at a Solution



Because X is compact, and yn is a subset of X, it must be bounded (I think?) and have a convergent subsequence, and inf(d(T^n(y),T^n(x))=delta for all n (and x_n=T^n(x) will also have a convergent subsequence). Show that the limits of y_n and x_n provide a contradiction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm really not sure where that hint is supposed to lead. Here is an alternative hint. You know X can be covered by a finite number of open balls of radius delta/2. Let N be the minimum number of open balls of radius delta/2 you need to cover X. Now throw away a ball containing x. It's doesn't intersect f(X). That means f(X) can be covered by N-1 balls. Do you see a problem looming here? Think about inverse images.
 
Is the next step something like:
Take a=sup(T(x'),T(x)) and because X is compact, it is closed, therefore using distance preservation of T there exists at least on x in X such that
d(x',x)=a
then lead this to contradiction?
 
Ratpigeon said:
Is the next step something like:
Take a=sup(T(x'),T(x)) and because X is compact, it is closed, therefore using distance preservation of T there exists at least on x in X such that
d(x',x)=a
then lead this to contradiction?

I don't see what contradiction that leads to.
 
Sorry - that one was completely off track, but I think I got it out now, thanks
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K