MHB Show that if K is regular and M any language, then L is regular

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Language Regular
Click For Summary
If K is a regular language and M is any language, then the language L, defined as L={k | km ∈ K for some m ∈ M}, is also regular. This can be shown by taking a DFA that accepts K and modifying its accepting states to include states q where the transition function δ(q, m) leads to an accepting state for some m in M. The key distinction between the DFAs for K and L lies in the set of final states. The transition function remains the same, but the acceptance criteria change based on the presence of m in M. Thus, L is regular as it can be represented by a modified DFA derived from K.
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $L=\{k |km \in K \text{ for some } m \in M\}$.

How can we show that if $K$ is regular and $M$ is any language, then $L$ is regular?? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a nice problem. Take a DFA $(Q,\Sigma,\delta,q_0,F)$ that accept $K$ and make $q\in Q$ accepting iff $\delta(q,m)\in F$ for some $m\in M$. Here $\delta(q,m)$ is the extension of the transition function to strings.
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
This is a nice problem. Take a DFA $(Q,\Sigma,\delta,q_0,F)$ that accept $K$ and make $q\in Q$ accepting iff $\delta(q,m)\in F$ for some $m\in M$. Here $\delta(q,m)$ is the extension of the transition function to strings.

So, is the transition function of $L$ the same as the transition function of $K$ ? If it stands that $\delta(q,m)\in F$ for some $m \in M$, then we make $q$ an accepting state. So the difference of the description of the two DFA's is the set of final states. Have I understood it correctly?
 
Yes, you understood it correctly.
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
Yes, you understood it correctly.

Great! Thank you very much! (Smile)
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. But this one involves probability, known as the Monty Hall Problem. Please see any number of YouTube videos on this for an explanation, I'll leave it to them to explain it. I question the predicate of all those who answer this...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
920