Show that potential difference can be defined in these two ways

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating the equivalence of two definitions of potential difference (P.D): P.D = |E| × d and P.D = W/Q. Participants clarify that P.D represents electric potential difference, where |E| is the electric field strength and d is the distance. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the dot product in the context of work done, as well as the relationship between force, work, and electric fields. The final conclusion is that both definitions of potential difference are valid and can be derived from each other using the appropriate equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and potential difference
  • Familiarity with the concepts of work and energy in physics
  • Knowledge of vector operations, specifically dot products
  • Basic grasp of calculus, particularly integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between electric fields and potential difference in detail
  • Learn about the integral form of work done in physics, W = ∫F·dr
  • Explore the concept of dot products in vector mathematics
  • Investigate the implications of magnetic fields on electric potential and work
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of electric fields and potential difference in electrical engineering contexts.

CraigH
Messages
221
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Show that P.D = {|E|} × {d} is equivalent to P.D = \frac{W}{Q}

Potential Difference equals electric field strength meters, or work done per unit charge

(for the equation P.D = |E| X d I cannot remember if it is a dot or cross product. I'm asking this question from memory as I do not have the question sheet in front of me. Can someone please say if it is dot or cross and explain?)

Homework Equations



\underline{F} = \frac{qQ}{\underline{r}^2} * \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}} * \underline{\widehat{r}}_{qQ}

\underline{\widehat{r}}_{qQ} Is the unit vector in the direction to get from q to Q\underline{E} = \frac{Q}{\underline{r}^2} * \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}} * \underline{\widehat{r}}\underline{F} = \underline{E}qV = - \oint\underline{E}.d\underline{l}

The Attempt at a Solution



First I made sure that the units agree with each other.

Basic units
Length = m
Mass = Kg
Time = s
Electric Current = A

So...
Force = m·kg·s-2
Work done = m2·kg·s-2
Electric field strength = m·kg·s-3·A-1
Potential Difference = m2·kg·s-3·A-1
Chrarge = s·A

E meters will have units m2·kg·s-3·A-1
Work done per unit charge will have units (m2·kg·s-2)/s·A = m2·kg·s-3·A-1
Both of these are the units of electrical potential difference so the units agree.

I then tried getting the equations to equal each other, or tried deriving one equation from the other. This is where I got stuck.

|E|=q/(4(pi)epsilon0(r^2))
|E|*r = q/(4(pi)epsilon0(r)

W = ? what equation should I use here?

Thanks for reading!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi CraigH! :smile:
CraigH said:
Show that P.D = {|E|} × {d} is equivalent to P.D = \frac{W}{Q}

(i think that should be E . d and W/I :wink:)

you have to prove two equivalent definitions of voltage

power/current = force "dot" distance …

how is power related to energy?

how is current related to charge?

how is energy related to work done?

how is work done related to force?

how is field related to force and charge? :wink:
 
I think craig was using W to mean work, in which case, it should be W/Q. Also, I think when craig is writing P.D he means potential difference, i.e. electric potential difference (voltage). (Not power times distance).

CraigH said:
P.D = |E| X d I cannot remember if it is a dot or cross product.
You've got the definition in your 'relevant equations' section:
V = - \oint\underline{E}.d\underline{l}
There is a very similar equation relating force to work. If you can remember that, then you will be half-way to getting the answer.
 
Hi Bruce,
Yes I was using P.D for potential difference and W for work done. The equation for work done is:

W= ∫F.dr

The integral of force over distance. I believe this is also a dot product, as it is only the distance moved in the direction of the force that matters.

So I'll try to use this to equate P.D=W/Q and P.D= ∫E.dlP.D = \frac{W}{Q}

P.D = \frac{\int F.dr}{Q}

F=EQ

E=\frac{F}{Q}

P.D = \int E.dr

Woo! I'm surprised I got this! Thank you!
 
Nice work man. This is such a nice analogy between (force and work) and (electric field and electric potential). Often if I get stuck on an electrodynamics problem, I think back to this analogy. But, you need to be careful, it can become more complicated if there are magnetic fields also.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
714
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
989
Replies
5
Views
2K