Show that the system has no closed orbits by finding a Lyapunov

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on demonstrating that a specific dynamical system has no closed orbits by finding a Lyapunov function. The user is tasked with identifying constants a and b such that the inequalities ax²(y - x³) + by²(-x - y³) < 0 and ax² + by² > 0 hold for all (x,y) ≠ (0,0). It is concluded that the origin is a non-hyperbolic saddle point and that no periodic orbits can exist in the system, as any periodic orbit must enclose at least one fixed point, which is not the case here.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lyapunov stability theory
  • Familiarity with dynamical systems and fixed points
  • Knowledge of inequalities and their implications in mathematical proofs
  • Basic calculus, particularly partial derivatives and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Lyapunov's direct method for stability analysis
  • Learn about non-hyperbolic fixed points and their characteristics
  • Explore the implications of periodic orbits in two-dimensional dynamical systems
  • Investigate the role of invariant sets in dynamical systems
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers interested in dynamical systems, stability analysis, and the application of Lyapunov functions in proving the absence of closed orbits.

Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12
Show that the system has no closed orbits by finding a Lyapunov ...

Homework Statement



I'm at the point in the problem where I need constants a and b satisfying

ax2(y-x3) + by2(-x-y3) < 0
and ax2+bx2 > 0

for all (x,y)≠(0,0).

Homework Equations



Just in case you're wondering, this is to satisfy the V(x,y)=ax2+by2 > 0 and ΔV(x,y)•<y-x3, -x-y3> < 0 so I can apply that one theorem to my problem.

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, it seems reasonable to choose a,b>0 to ensure ax2+bx2 > 0, but I'm having trouble figuring out how to make ax2(y-x3) + by2(-x-y3) < 0 simultaneously.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


For x=y, this can be simplified to ##(a-b)x^3 - (a+b)x^5 <0 ##, which cannot be true both for positive and negative small x.
 


Jamin2112 said:

Homework Statement



I'm at the point in the problem where I need constants a and b satisfying

ax2(y-x3) + by2(-x-y3) < 0
and ax2+bx2 > 0

for all (x,y)≠(0,0).

You won't be able to do that: on the assumption that V = ax^2 + by^2 and \dot V = ax^2(y - x^3) - by^2(x + y^3) your system is
<br /> \dot x = \textstyle\frac12 x(y - x^3) \\<br /> \dot y = -\textstyle\frac12 y(x + y^3).<br />
The fixed point at the origin is some kind of non-hyperbolic saddle: x = 0 and y = 0 are invariant. On x = 0, \dot y &lt; 0 for y \neq 0 and on y = 0, \dot x &lt; 0 for x \neq 0. Thus there are points arbitrarily close to the origin where motion is unambiguously away from the origin, and at these points \dot V &gt; 0.

However, you now know that no periodic orbit can cross the coordinate axes, so the origin cannot be inside a periodic orbit. Since the origin is the only fixed point (any other fixed point must satisfy x^8 = -1), there can be no periodic orbits (because in a 2D system every periodic orbit must enclose at least one fixed point).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K