Show that this dephasing operation is Markovian

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pete5876
  • Start date Start date
Pete5876
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Misplaced Homework Thread
Show that this dephasing operation is Markovian
$$E_t(\rho)=\left(\frac{1+e^{-t}}{2}\right)\rho + \left(\frac{1-e^{-t}}{2}\right)Z\rho Z$$

The operation is supposed to be Markovian when
$$E_g E_h = E_{g+h}$$

So this is what I get when I apply this multiplication
$$
E_g E_h=\frac{1+e^{-g}}{2}\frac{1+e^{-h}}{2} \rho^2 + \frac{1-e^{-g}}{2} \frac{1-e^{h}}{2}Z\rho ZZ\rho Z + \frac{1+e^{-g}}{2} \frac{1-e^{-h}}{2} = \rho Z \rho Z + \frac{1+e^{-g}}{2} \frac{1-e^{-h}}{2} Z \rho Z \rho
$$
We can lose ZZ because
$$ZZ=I$$
but I can't see what else can be done. ρ after all only commutes with Z if it's diagonal but we can't assume that for ρ in general?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have misunderstood the question. ##E_gE_h## means the composition of those functions.
The algebra might be a bit simpler using hyperbolic trig - if you know the formulae for ##\cosh(x+y)## etc.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top