Show there exists a SUBSEQUENCE converging to L

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around constructing a subsequence from a given sequence (x_n) that converges to a limit L. Participants emphasize the importance of properly denoting subsequences, suggesting the use of indices such as n_{k,j} for subsequences converging to L_k. The goal is to create a strictly increasing sequence (m_j) that converges to L, utilizing the previously defined indices. Clarity in notation is crucial for accurately representing the relationships between subsequences.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of subsequences in real analysis
  • Familiarity with convergence concepts in sequences
  • Knowledge of mathematical notation and indexing
  • Basic principles of limits and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the construction of subsequences in real analysis
  • Learn about the properties of convergent sequences
  • Explore different notational conventions in mathematical writing
  • Investigate the relationship between subsequences and limits in analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students of real analysis, mathematicians working with sequences, and anyone interested in understanding convergence and subsequence notation in mathematical contexts.

kingwinner
Messages
1,266
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


ra9.JPG


Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


Actually I read over this question for about 10 times already. But, I am not sure how to start. I know that I have to construct a subsequence one term at a time and show that it converges to L. But all the different subscripts and indices are just driving me crazy. So our target subsequence (the one that we need to construct at the end) is denoted as (xnk).
We are given that "For each k≥1, there is a subsequence of (xn) converging to Lk...". How should I denote this subsequence, then? I was thinking of (xni), but I think this would be the same as our target subsequence (xnk) because the i and k are just dummy variables. Also, it is "for EACH k≥1...", so this subsequence also has some dependence on k, so I think k should appear as part of the subscript as well? How should I label this subsequence properly?
So I am stuck even at the level of translating the question into mathematical symbols and summarizing what is given. Can someone please show me how?

I hope someone can help me out.
Thank you!



[note: also under discussion in Math Links forum]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Notation is yours to define as you see fit. In particular, you're not required to conform to the notation in the hint if it confuses you.

Start by giving names to the indices of the subsequences of [tex](x_n)[/tex] converging to each [tex]L_k[/tex]; you might call these indices [tex]n_{k,j}[/tex], so that for each [tex]k[/tex], [tex](n_{k,j})_{j=1}^\infty[/tex] is a strictly increasing sequence of natural numbers such that [tex](x_{n_{k,j}})_{j=1}^\infty[/tex] converges to [tex]L_k[/tex]. Your task is now to use these [tex]n_{k,j}[/tex] to choose a strictly increasing sequence [tex](m_j)_{j=1}^\infty[/tex] such that [tex](x_{m_j})_{j=1}^\infty[/tex] converges to [tex]L[/tex].
 
ystael said:
Notation is yours to define as you see fit. In particular, you're not required to conform to the notation in the hint if it confuses you.

Start by giving names to the indices of the subsequences of [tex](x_n)[/tex] converging to each [tex]L_k[/tex]; you might call these indices [tex]n_{k,j}[/tex], so that for each [tex]k[/tex], [tex](n_{k,j})_{j=1}^\infty[/tex] is a strictly increasing sequence of natural numbers such that [tex](x_{n_{k,j}})_{j=1}^\infty[/tex] converges to [tex]L_k[/tex]. Your task is now to use these [tex]n_{k,j}[/tex] to choose a strictly increasing sequence [tex](m_j)_{j=1}^\infty[/tex] such that [tex](x_{m_j})_{j=1}^\infty[/tex] converges to [tex]L[/tex].
Sorry, I'm confused...

1) But if you write (xnkj), it would mean that it is a (further) subsequence of (xnk), right? But (xnk) is our target subsequence, and I don't think there is such a connection...

2) Why are you using "m" in xmj (target subsequence)?
Also, shouldn't there be some dependecy on k? (as the hint suggested?)

Maybe someone can clarify this, please? What is the usual (and correct) way to denote the DIFFERENT subsequences of (xn)?

Thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K