MHB Showing a probability is of order (Dt)^2

  • Thread starter Thread starter DinkyDoe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the probability of transitions between states \(C\) and \(O\) in the time interval \([0, \Delta t]\), specifically the sequence \(C \to O \to C\). The transition times \(T^+\) and \(T^-\) are modeled as independent exponential random variables. A triple integral is proposed to express the probability, integrating over the appropriate bounds to account for the conditions of the transitions. The final goal is to demonstrate that this probability is of order \(O(\Delta t^2)\), which is achieved through a Taylor expansion of the cumulative distribution function. The calculations confirm that the coefficients for \(\Delta t^0\) and \(\Delta t\) are zero, while the coefficient for \(\Delta t^2\) is non-zero, validating the desired result.
DinkyDoe
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hoi. I want to prove the following:

Suppose we want to calculate the probability that we have transitions $C\to O\to C$
in the time interval $[0,\Delta t]$ where $C,O$ stand for different states. (we start in state $C$) And we have $T^+ \sim \exp(\lambda _+)$ and $T^- \sim \exp(\lambda_-)$ where $T^+$ is the time between a transition from $C\to O$, and $T^-$ the time between a transition $O\to C$. I want to show that the probability is of order $(\Delta t)^2$. So we need not know the probability explicitly. But suppose we try to do this explicity...

So i guess we need a triple integral for this...if we want to do this explicitly, we want to integrate over all $0<s_1<s_2\leq \Delta t$ so that

$P(T^+\leq s_1)$,
$P(T^-\leq s_2-s_1)$,
$P(T^+>\Delta t-s_1-s_2)$ (since we want after $C\to O \to C$ that it doesn't flip back to state $O$ within $[0,\Delta t]$)

And we simply assume independance...so I guess we can multiply the density functions
and make some triple integral with the correct boundaries. But I'm really confusing myself with this...

using the probability densities we must get some integral $\int\int\int ... ds_1ds_2dy$

Can someone see through my confusion, and point me in the right direction? I guess I'm not such a big calculus-star.

Thanks :)

---------- Post added at 01:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:39 PM ----------

Could it be that this is the correct integral? $\int_0^{\Delta t}p_+(s_1)\left(\int_{s_1}^{\Delta t}p_-(s_2)\left(\int _{\Delta t-s_1-s_2}^{\infty}p_+(x)dx\right)ds_2\right)ds_1$

---------- Post added at 02:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:50 PM ----------

DinkyDoe said:
Hoi. I want to prove the following:

Suppose we want to calculate the probability that we have transitions $C\to O\to C$
in the time interval $[0,\Delta t]$ where $C,O$ stand for different states. (we start in state $C$) And we have $T^+ \sim \exp(\lambda _+)$ and $T^- \sim \exp(\lambda_-)$ where $T^+$ is the time between a transition from $C\to O$, and $T^-$ the time between a transition $O\to C$. I want to show that the probability is of order $(\Delta t)^2$. So we need not know the probability explicitly. But suppose we try to do this explicity...

So i guess we need a triple integral for this...if we want to do this explicitly, we want to integrate over all $0<s_1<s_2\leq \Delta t$ so that

$T^+\leq s_1$,
$T^-\leq s_2-s_1$,
$T^+>\Delta t-s_1-s_2$ (since we want after $C\to O \to C$ that it doesn't flip back to state $O$ within $[0,\Delta t]$)

And we simply assume independance...so I guess we can multiply the density functions
and make some triple integral with the correct boundaries. But I'm really confusing myself with this...

using the probability densities we must get some integral $\int\int\int ... ds_1ds_2dy$

Can someone see through my confusion, and point me in the right direction? I guess I'm not such a big calculus-star.

Thanks :)

---------- Post added at 01:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:39 PM ----------

Could it be that this is the correct integral? $\int_0^{\Delta t}p_+(s_1)\left(\int_{s_1}^{\Delta t}p_-(s_2)\left(\int _{\Delta t-s_1-s_2}^{\infty}p_+(x)dx\right)ds_2\right)ds_1$

edit 2: sorry...think i solved it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DinkyDoe said:
Hoi. I want to prove the following:

Suppose we want to calculate the probability that we have transitions $C\to O\to C$
in the time interval $[0,\Delta t]$ where $C,O$ stand for different states. (we start in state $C$) And we have $T^+ \sim \exp(\lambda _+)$ and $T^- \sim \exp(\lambda_-)$ where $T^+$ is the time between a transition from $C\to O$, and $T^-$ the time between a transition $O\to C$. I want to show that the probability is of order $(\Delta t)^2$. So we need not know the probability explicitly. But suppose we try to do this explicity...

So i guess we need a triple integral for this...if we want to do this explicitly, we want to integrate over all $0<s_1<s_2\leq \Delta t$ so that

$P(T^+\leq s_1)$,
$P(T^-\leq s_2-s_1)$,
$P(T^+>\Delta t-s_1-s_2)$ (since we want after $C\to O \to C$ that it doesn't flip back to state $O$ within $[0,\Delta t]$)

And we simply assume independance...so I guess we can multiply the density functions
and make some triple integral with the correct boundaries. But I'm really confusing myself with this...

using the probability densities we must get some integral $\int\int\int ... ds_1ds_2dy$

Can someone see through my confusion, and point me in the right direction? I guess I'm not such a big calculus-star.

Thanks :)

---------- Post added at 01:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:39 PM ----------

Could it be that this is the correct integral? $\int_0^{\Delta t}p_+(s_1)\left(\int_{s_1}^{\Delta t}p_-(s_2)\left(\int _{\Delta t-s_1-s_2}^{\infty}p_+(x)dx\right)ds_2\right)ds_1$

---------- Post added at 02:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:50 PM ----------



edit 2: sorry...think i solved it
It is very simple you are asking for the asymtotic form (as \( \Delta t \to 0\) ) of the cumulative distribution \( F_{T^++T^-}(\Delta t) \), where we know the density:

\[f_{T^++T^-}(z)=\int_0^z \lambda_+e^{-\lambda_+(z-y)} \lambda_-e^{-\lambda_-y}dy\]

Both the required integrals are elementary, then a power series expansion of \( F_{T^++T^-}(\Delta t) \) about \( \Delta t=0\) and you are done.

That is; the key idea here is that the density of the sum of two independant random variables is the convolution of their individual densities.

Now if you want that the probability that there is no further transition in the interval it does become a bit more complicated .. but an application of Bayes' theorem should do it.

CB
 
Last edited:
CaptainBlack said:
It is very simple you are asking for the asymtotic form (as \( \Delta t \to 0\) ) of the cumulative distribution \( F_{T^++T^-}(\Delta t) \), where we know the density:

\[f_{T^++T^-}(z)=\int_0^z \lambda_+e^{-\lambda_+(z-y)} \lambda_-e^{-\lambda_-y}dy\]

Both the required integrals are elementary, then a power series expansion of \( F_{T^++T^-}(\Delta t) \) about \( \Delta t=0\) and you are done.

That is; the key idea here is that the density of the sum of two independant random variables is the convolution of their individual densities.

Now if you want that the probability that there is no further transition in the interval it does become a bit more complicated .. but an application of Bayes' theorem should do it.

CB
Thank you. Sounds cool, then you're actually using more advanced stuff. I did it in a more elementary way...I think I solved it correctly. I worked it out in Latex:

So we want to calculate the probability that we have transitions $C\to O \to C$ within the time-interval $[0,\Delta t]$. Here we denote by $T^+$ the time between transition $C\to O$, and $T^-$ the time between transition $O\to C$, where $T^+\sim \exp(\lambda _+)$ and $T^-\sim \exp(\lambda_-)$ . Denote by $p^+(x)$ and $p^-(x)$ the corresponding density functions. Observe that we want to intgrate over all possible $0<s_1<s_2\leq \Delta t$ such that $T^+\leq s_1$, $T^-\leq s_2-s_1$, and $T^+>\Delta t-s_1-s_2$ since we don't want to flip back $C\to O$ after $C\to O\to C$ within the time-interval $[0,\Delta t]$. This leads to the following integral $$ \int_0^{\Delta t}p_+(s_1)\left(\int_{s_1}^{\Delta t}p_-(s_2)\left(\int _{\Delta t-s_1-s_2}^{\infty}p_+(x)dx\right)ds_2\right)ds_1$$
Calculating the integral gives us $$\left(\frac{\lambda_-}{\lambda_+-\lambda_-}\right)\left( \left(\frac{1}{\lambda_+}\right)\left(e^{(\lambda_+-\lambda_-)\Delta t}-e^{-\lambda_-\Delta t}\right)+\left(\frac{1}{2\lambda_+-\lambda_-}\right)\left(e^{-\lambda_+\Delta t}-e^{(\lambda_+-\lambda_-)\Delta t}\right)\right)$$Using the taylor expansion of $e^x$, we show that the above expression equals $O(\Delta t^2)$. That is, we show that in its Taylor expansion, the coefficients of $\Delta t^0$ and $\Delta t$ are zero, and the coefficient of $\Delta t^2$ is unequal to zero. We can forget the factor $\frac{\lambda_-}{\lambda_+-\lambda_-}$. The case $\Delta t^0$ is obvious. We check that the coefficient of $\Delta t $ equals zero. Namely, observe that $$\left(\frac{1}{\lambda_+}\right)\left(\left(\lambda_+-\lambda_-\right)\Delta t+\lambda_-\Delta t\right)+ \left(\frac{1}{2\lambda_+-\lambda_-}\right)\left(-\lambda_+\Delta t+(\lambda_+-\lambda_-)\Delta t\right) = \Delta t-\Delta t =0$$
After another straightforward verification, we find that the coefficient of $\Delta t^2$ equals $\frac{\lambda-}{2}\neq 0$. Therefore, for small intervals $[0,\Delta t]$ the probability of the event $[C\to O\to C]$ is $O(\Delta t^2)$.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
Back
Top