Showing a vector field is imcompressible

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the properties of a vector field, specifically in the context of demonstrating its incompressibility. Participants are examining the separation of components within the vector field and the implications of the notation used for vectors and their magnitudes.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the validity of separating the components of the vector field based on the expression for its magnitude. There is confusion regarding the notation used for vectors and their magnitudes, particularly the distinction between bold and non-bold representations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the notation, indicating that the bold-faced vector represents the vector itself while the non-bold version denotes its magnitude. There appears to be an ongoing exploration of how these representations affect the understanding of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of treating the magnitude as a constant versus a variable, and there is a specific mention of a graphic that may have contributed to the confusion regarding the notation.

question dude
Messages
80
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


attachment.php?attachmentid=455997&d=1440616258.jpg


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



As you can see, the solution is shown just below the question.

Essentially, I don't understand how the x, y and z component of the vector field has been separated because the numerator of the vector field's fraction is: (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(1/2)

It seems like they've just taken x^2 out and square rooted it to get 'x', but you can't do that, can you?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
question dude said:

Homework Statement


attachment.php?attachmentid=455997&d=1440616258.jpg


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



As you can see, the solution is shown just below the question.

Essentially, I don't understand how the x, y and z component of the vector field has been separated because the numerator of the vector field's fraction is: (x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^(1/2)

It seems like they've just taken x^2 out and square rooted it to get 'x', but you can't do that, can you?

That isn't what they have done. The numerator is bold faced ##\bf{r}## and the denominator is ##r##. The first is the vector and the second its magnitude. r = xi + yj + zk.
 
LCKurtz said:
That isn't what they have done. The numerator is bold faced ##\bf{r}## and the denominator is ##r##. The first is the vector and the second its magnitude. r = xi + yj + zk.

Do I treat the non-bold r as a constant?

If sub in bold r, I get:

G = [(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^0.5 ] / 4*pi*r^3
 
question dude said:
Do I treat the non-bold r as a constant?

If sub in bold r, I get:

G = [(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)^0.5 ] / 4*pi*r^3

I just noticed in your graphic under (b) they have ##{\bf r} = \sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}## That should not have been a bold face r. The bold face r represents the vector and the plain r its magnitude, which is not constant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K