Showing stability under scaling and additivity of distriubtions

  • Thread starter Thread starter stukbv
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scaling Stability
AI Thread Summary
To demonstrate the properties of gamma distributions, it is established that if X ~ r(a1, B) and Y ~ r(a2, B) are independent, then X + Y follows a gamma distribution with parameters r(a1 + a2, B). The moment-generating function (mgf) approach confirms this result, provided it is expressed clearly. For the second property, the transformation of a random variable cX involves adjusting the probability density function (pdf) and cumulative distribution function (cdf) accordingly, leading to the conclusion that cX ~ r(a1, cB). The discussion emphasizes the importance of clarity in mathematical expressions and understanding the underlying principles of distribution transformations. Overall, the thread provides insights into the stability and additivity of gamma distributions under scaling and addition.
stukbv
Messages
112
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to show that if X ~ r(a1,B) Y ~ r(a2,b) where r means gamma distribution then if X and Y are independent
i) X+Y ~ r(a1+a2,B)
ii) cX ~ r(a1,cB)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



i) i use the mgfs of x and y and ended up with mgf(x+y) = (1/1-Bt)^(a1 + a2 )
I am told this is enough to prove i, is this correct or what could i say to make it better?

ii) i am a bit stuck on this one, i mean, would you just put c in front of all the x's in the pdf and then re-derive the mgf? or is there something extra?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stukbv said:

Homework Statement


I need to show that if X ~ r(a1,B) Y ~ r(a2,b) where r means gamma distribution then if X and Y are independent
i) X+Y ~ r(a1+a2,B)
ii) cX ~ r(a1,cB)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



i) i use the mgfs of x and y and ended up with mgf(x+y) = (1/1-Bt)^(a1 + a2 )
I am told this is enough to prove i, is this correct or what could i say to make it better?

ii) i am a bit stuck on this one, i mean, would you just put c in front of all the x's in the pdf and then re-derive the mgf? or is there something extra?

thanks

I suppose your "i" is supposed to be "I", rather than the square root of -1? Anyway, your result in (i) would be OK if you wrote it properly, with brackets to make things clear. That is, instead of writing (1/1-Bt)^(a1+a2)---which equals [1 - Bt]^(a1+a2)---you should write 1/(1-Bt)^(a1+a2), or (1 - Bt)^(-a1-a2) or (1-Bt)^{-(a1+a2)}. As to (ii): what is the problem? If f(x) is the density function of a random variable X, what is the density function of Y = c*X for a constant c? Alternatively, if F(x) is the (cumulative) distribution function of X, that is, P{X >= x} = F(x), then what is the cumulative distribution of Y = c*X? Then you can differentiate the distribution to get the density.

RGV
 
Is this where I say X = Y/c so then i put into fx y/c in place of all x's and then multiply by 1/c to get fY?
 
If F(x) = P{X <= x} and Y = c*X (with c > 0 a constant) then P{Y <= y} = P{c*X <= y} = P{X <] y/c} = F(y/c). The density of Y is g(y) = (d/dy)F(y/c) = f(y/c)/c, where f(x) = probability density of X. Alternatively: g(y)*dy = P{y < Y < y+dy} = P{y < c*X < y+dy} = P{y/c < X < y/c + dy/c} = f(y/c)*dy/c, so g(y) = f(y/c)/c. So, the answer to your question is YES, but I much prefer to get it from first principles.

RGV
 
Ok so now I have 1/c ( 1/(r(a)B^a) * (y/c)^a-1 .e^(-y/cB)
Is that right ?
 
I don't know. You have all the formulas you need.

RGV
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top