Sierpinskis Gasket - Linear Algebra

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical concept of the Sierpiński Gasket, specifically focusing on the iterative mapping of triangles defined by functions f1, f2, and f3. The participants explore the proof that the intersection set S of all triangles ∆n is non-empty and satisfies the condition S = f1(S) ∪ f2(S) ∪ f3(S). The proof involves induction and the properties of the triangular regions generated through the mappings. Key insights include the proper inclusion of ∆n+1 within ∆n and the iterative nature of the mappings leading to the intersection.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, particularly geometric transformations.
  • Familiarity with mathematical induction techniques.
  • Knowledge of set theory and intersection properties.
  • Basic understanding of the Sierpiński Gasket and its construction.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of fractals, specifically the Sierpiński Gasket.
  • Learn about mathematical induction and its applications in proofs.
  • Explore geometric transformations in linear algebra.
  • Investigate the implications of set intersections in topology.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone interested in fractal geometry and its proofs will benefit from this discussion.

Upsidealien
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Where
:- ∆0 = ∆ is the original triangle ABC.
:- DEF are the midpoints of AB, BC, AC respectively.
:- f1, f2, f3 map the triangular region ABC to the triangular region ADF, DBE and FEC respectively.
:- ∆n+1 = f1(∆n) ∪ f2(∆n) ∪ f3(∆n) for n≥0.

(these are just definitions of Sierpinskis gasket)

1. We need to first sketch ∆1 and ∆2 and prove that ∆n+1 ⊆ ∆n for all n ≥ 0.

We then define S = intersection of ∆n from n=1 to ∞.

2. We then need to prove that S is non-empty and that S = f1(S) ∪ f2(S) ∪ f3(S).

Homework Equations



Given above.

The Attempt at a Solution



I attempted 1. by using induction but did not get very far and for 2. I have proved that S ⊇ f1(S) ∪ f2(S) ∪ f3(S) but I am struggling to prove S ⊆ f1(S) ∪ f2(S) ∪ f3(S) Thanks

Tom
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So you basically at the n+1 step map the n-th triangle to three of its interior triangles, and leaving the middle triangle intact. Doesn't this by itself prove the inclusion, even proper inclusion.

For the intersection, take x\in S thus for every n \geq 1 x is in delta(n), thus x\in f_1(\Delta n)\cup f_2(\Delta(n)\cup f_3(\Delta(n)) for every n>0, thus you can keep iterating it ad infinitum, thus x\in f_1(S)\cup f_2(S)\cup f_3(S).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K