Measuring Vectors: Force Exerted on Tripod Legs

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves analyzing the forces exerted on the legs of a tripod supporting a television camera, specifically relating position vectors to force vectors in a calculus context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between position and force vectors, questioning how these vectors relate in the context of the tripod setup. There is an exploration of the assumption that forces act only in the direction of the legs, with some participants seeking clarity on this point.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants attempting to clarify the assumptions regarding the direction of forces in relation to the legs of the tripod. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between the camera's position and the legs, but clarity is still sought by some members.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a textbook problem and are discussing the implications of their assumptions about force directionality and vector relationships.

Bassa
Messages
46
Reaction score
1
vector.jpg

Homework Statement


This is an example problem in my calculus textbook. I don't get how they relate the position vector to the force vector. I have taken a calculus based physics course and I don't remember establishing such relationship between the position and the force vectors.

Note: I have attached a picture of the situation.
[/B]
A television camera weighing 120 pounds is supported by a tripod, as shown in Figure 11.23. Represent the force exerted on each leg of the tripod as a vector.

Homework Equations


u=cv
v + u= v1 + u1, v2 + u2, v3 + u3
cv=cv1, cv2, cv3

3. The Attempt at a Solution
Let the vectors and represent the forces exerted on the three legs. From Figure 11.23, you can determine the directions of and to be as follows:[/B]

PQ1= <0,-1,-4>
PQ2= <√3/2, 1/2,-4>
PQ3= <-√3/2, 1/2,-4>


Because each leg has the same length, and the total force is distributed equally among the three legs, you know that the magnitude of F1=F2=F3. So, there exists a constant such that

F1= c<0,-1,-4>=F2= c<√3/2, 1/2,-4>=F3= c<-√3/2, 1/2,-4>
Let the total force exerted by the object be given by F= <0,0,-120> Then, using the fact that

F= F1 + F2 + F3


you can conclude that F1, F2, and F3 all have a vertical component of -40. This implies that c(-4)= -40 and c is equal to 10.
Therefore, the forces exerted on the legs can be represented by

F1= <0,- 10, -40>
F2= <5√3, 5, -40>
F3= <-5√3, 5, -40>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The assumption is that the legs only take up forces in the longitudinal direction and therefore must take a force in the direction they are pointing.
 
Orodruin said:
The assumption is that the legs only take up forces in the longitudinal direction and therefore must take a force in the direction they are pointing.

I'm sorry, but I am still not very clear on this.
 
It is an assumption (which will tend to be well founded). If the legs only take forces parallel to themselves, then the force in a leg must be proportional to any vector which is parallel to the leg. In particular, the difference vector between the camera position and where a leg stands is parallel to the leg.
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K