- #1
- 1
- 0
Hi everyone! I have the following problem
X is countable set if and only if the sigma-field 2[tex]_{X}[/tex] is generated by the sets of the form [tex]\left\{[/tex][tex]\omega[/tex][tex]\right\}[/tex] with [tex]\omega[/tex][tex]\in[/tex] X
The easy part is X is countable then...
I'm trying to prove the other part. So, I know that the sigma-field 2[tex]_{X}[/tex] is generated by the sets of the form [tex]\left\{[/tex][tex]\omega[/tex][tex]\right\}[/tex] with [tex]\omega[/tex][tex]\in[/tex] X. This means that 2[tex]_{X}[/tex] can be written as
2[tex]_{X}[/tex]=[tex]\cap[/tex] [tex]\sigma[/tex][tex]_{\alpha}[/tex]
where [tex]\sigma[/tex][tex]_{\alpha}[/tex] are all the sigma-fields that contain the family of the singletons. But 2[tex]_{X}[/tex] is the biggest sigma-field that can be constructed in X. That means that [tex]\sigma[/tex][tex]_{\alpha}[/tex]=2[tex]_{X}[/tex] [tex]\forall[/tex]
[tex]\alpha[/tex].
Now suppose that X is uncountable. Be the sigma-field [tex]\sigma[/tex] constructed in the following manner:
A[tex]\subseteq[/tex] X is in the [tex]\sigma[/tex] if A is countable or finite or if X\A is countable or finite.
It is clear that this sigma-field contains the class formed by the singletons in X. However, this class it is not 2[tex]_{X}[/tex], because if X is uncountable exists B[tex]\subset[/tex] uncountable with X\B uncountable. That is, B is not in [tex]\sigma[/tex]. This means that
2[tex]_{X}[/tex] is not equal to [tex]\cap[/tex] [tex]\sigma[/tex][tex]_{\alpha}[/tex]
So, this is a contradiction and X is numerable.
So, my questions are:
1) Is this proof correct?
2) If it is correct, I think that the critical point in it is this fact I used:
If X is uncountable exists B[tex]\subset[/tex] uncountable with X\B uncountable
How can I prove this? I think that I need to use the axiom of choice, but I have no clue how to do it.
Thanks and sorry for my bad english
Homework Statement
X is countable set if and only if the sigma-field 2[tex]_{X}[/tex] is generated by the sets of the form [tex]\left\{[/tex][tex]\omega[/tex][tex]\right\}[/tex] with [tex]\omega[/tex][tex]\in[/tex] X
Homework Equations
The Attempt at a Solution
The easy part is X is countable then...
I'm trying to prove the other part. So, I know that the sigma-field 2[tex]_{X}[/tex] is generated by the sets of the form [tex]\left\{[/tex][tex]\omega[/tex][tex]\right\}[/tex] with [tex]\omega[/tex][tex]\in[/tex] X. This means that 2[tex]_{X}[/tex] can be written as
2[tex]_{X}[/tex]=[tex]\cap[/tex] [tex]\sigma[/tex][tex]_{\alpha}[/tex]
where [tex]\sigma[/tex][tex]_{\alpha}[/tex] are all the sigma-fields that contain the family of the singletons. But 2[tex]_{X}[/tex] is the biggest sigma-field that can be constructed in X. That means that [tex]\sigma[/tex][tex]_{\alpha}[/tex]=2[tex]_{X}[/tex] [tex]\forall[/tex]
[tex]\alpha[/tex].
Now suppose that X is uncountable. Be the sigma-field [tex]\sigma[/tex] constructed in the following manner:
A[tex]\subseteq[/tex] X is in the [tex]\sigma[/tex] if A is countable or finite or if X\A is countable or finite.
It is clear that this sigma-field contains the class formed by the singletons in X. However, this class it is not 2[tex]_{X}[/tex], because if X is uncountable exists B[tex]\subset[/tex] uncountable with X\B uncountable. That is, B is not in [tex]\sigma[/tex]. This means that
2[tex]_{X}[/tex] is not equal to [tex]\cap[/tex] [tex]\sigma[/tex][tex]_{\alpha}[/tex]
So, this is a contradiction and X is numerable.
So, my questions are:
1) Is this proof correct?
2) If it is correct, I think that the critical point in it is this fact I used:
If X is uncountable exists B[tex]\subset[/tex] uncountable with X\B uncountable
How can I prove this? I think that I need to use the axiom of choice, but I have no clue how to do it.
Thanks and sorry for my bad english