Let [itex]\gamma^{\rho} \in M_{4}(\mathbb{R})[/itex] be the Majorana representation of the Dirac algebra (in spacetime signature [itex]\eta_{00} = -1[/itex]), and consider the Majorana Lagrangian [tex]\mathcal{L} = \mathrm{i} \theta^{\mathrm{T}} \gamma^{0} (\gamma^{\rho} \partial_{\rho} - m) \theta,[/tex] where [itex]\theta[/itex] is a Grassmann-valued four-spinor. The associated gravitational energy-density, the 00-component of the Belinfante energy-momentum tensor, I calculate to be [tex]\Theta^{00} = \frac{\mathrm{i}}{2} [ \theta^{\mathrm{T}} (\partial^{0} \theta) - (\partial^{0} \theta)^{\mathrm{T}} \theta].[/tex] Inserting into it the stationary plane, wave solution [itex]\theta = \mathrm{exp}(\gamma^{0}Et)\eta[/itex], where [itex]\eta[/itex] is some spacetime-independent, Grassmann-valued four-spinor, yields [itex]\Theta^{00} = \mathrm{i} E \eta^{\mathrm{T}} \gamma^{0} \eta[/itex]. Due to [itex](xy)^{*} \equiv y^{*}x^{*}[/itex] for Grassmann-valued quantities, this expression for [itex]\Theta^{00}[/itex](adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); iscomplex self-conjugate (and nonvanishing), as it should be, but it is not real-valued.

In comparison, for the Dirac Lagrangian, [tex]\mathcal{L}_{D} = -\mathrm{i} \psi^{\dagger} \gamma^{0} (\gamma^{\rho} \partial_{\rho} - m) \psi,[/tex] also in spacetime signature [itex]\eta_{00} = -1[/itex], a similar calculation of the gravitational energy-density yields for a plane wave solution [itex]\psi = \mathrm{exp}(-\mathrm{i}Et)\psi_{0}[/itex] the real-valued expression [itex]\Theta^{00} = E \psi_{0}^{\dagger} \psi_{0}[/itex]. The exact sign of [itex] -\mathrm{i} \psi^{\dagger} \gamma^{0} \gamma^{0} \partial_{0} \psi = +\mathrm{i} \psi^{\dagger} \partial_{0} \psi [/itex] in [itex]\mathcal{L}_{D}[/itex] is essential for this energy-density to be positive-definite.

And now to my question: Is it nonsensical to analogously contemplate what the sign of the time derivative should be in the case of the Majorana Lagrangian? And if not, what is it?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Sign of the time derivative of the Majorana Lagrangian

Loading...

Similar Threads - Sign derivative Majorana | Date |
---|---|

A Angular momentum operator derived from Lorentz invariance | Feb 17, 2018 |

A Relative sign in diagrams for ##Z##-boson exchange for ##WW## scattering | Mar 26, 2017 |

Any signs of fundamental blocks of energy? | Apr 19, 2015 |

Sign of Levi-Civita Symbol in spherical coordinates | Feb 5, 2015 |

Doubt on sign of the propagator on Peskin | Mar 26, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**