Graduate Signal Processing and the Duffing ODE

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the reconstruction of a signal from the Duffing ODE using FFT analysis. The user initially questions the accuracy of their signal reconstruction, suspecting an error. They later identify that the issue was related to the sampling rate, specifically the Nyquist frequency, which caused inaccuracies in the FFT results. The user recalls a previous exercise in MATLAB where they successfully verified FFT accuracy by combining two sine waves. Ultimately, they resolved their confusion by returning to a pure sine wave for validation.
member 428835
Hi PF!

Attached are two plots: signal.pdf is a solution from the Duffing ODE, and plots vertical displacement over time, both the raw signal (blue) and the reconstructed signal from an FFT (red). I've also shown a zoomed in view so you can see how oscillatory the signal is.

pow.pdf plots the FFT, showing one main frequency observed.

My question is, have I correctly reconstructed this signal? Sure look like I've done something terribly wrong, but perhaps I have not?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
NVM, I figured it out. Thanks though.
 
Yep! Only took me all afternoon to figure it our lol
 
There that's frequency constraint aka the Nyquist frequency that always gets me.

When we first did FFT plots in MATLAB we constructed a dual signal by adding two sine curves and then checking to see that the FFT got the spectrum right.
 
  • Like
Likes member 428835
jedishrfu said:
There that's frequency constraint aka the Nyquist frequency that always gets me.

When we first did FFT plots in MATLAB we constructed a dual signal by adding two sine curves and then checking to see that the FFT got the spectrum right.
That's ultimately how I figured out what was wrong actually...take it back to a pure sine wave and it better be 100% accurate right?
 
Thread 'What is the pressure of trapped air inside this tube?'
As you can see from the picture, i have an uneven U-shaped tube, sealed at the short end. I fill the tube with water and i seal it. So the short side is filled with water and the long side ends up containg water and trapped air. Now the tube is sealed on both sides and i turn it in such a way that the traped air moves at the short side. Are my claims about pressure in senarios A & B correct? What is the pressure for all points in senario C? (My question is basically coming from watching...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K