Significance of ((H,x),x) double commutator?

Peeter
Messages
303
Reaction score
3
I've just done a textbook exersize to calculate (H,x) and ((H,x),x) for H= p^2/2m +V.

Having done the manipulation, my next question is what is the significance of this calculation. Where would one use these commutator and double commutator relations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One place where the double (and higher) commutator comes into play is when you perform a transformation, such as a rotation or a translation.

Transformations such as these are performed through a unitary transformation U. In turn, such a unitary transformation is said to be generated by the Hermitian operator A if we can write:

U = e^{iA}

Here the exponential of an operator is defined through the Taylor series of the exponential. Now, the effect of this transformation is that it transforms vectors in your Hilbert space as:

|v\rangle \longrightarrow |v'\rangle = e^{iA}|v\rangle

Operators which act on this Hilbert space are also transformed, namely:

O \longrightarrow O' = U^\dagOU = e^{-iA}Oe^{iA}

With this definition the expecation value of the operator O is invariant under the transformation, i.e.

\langle v|O|v\rangle \langle v'|O'|v'\rangle

Anyways, if you expand the transformation of the operator, i.e. if you just use the Taylor series, you will find that it looks like:

e^{iA}Oe^{-iA} = O + i[O,A] + \frac{i^2}{2!} [[O,A],A] + \ldots

where the dots denote the triple and higher commutators.

Long story short, the higher order commutators of two operators determine the transformation properties of one operator with respect to the transformation generated by the other operator.
 
Adding to the above:

mx is the generator of the Galilean boost (see e.g. "http://www.physics.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/QM/brown_ajp_67_204_99.pdf" "). So if you want to calculate how H changes when you change your reference frame to a moving one with velocity v, you will have to calculate the double commutator. (The higher commutators will be easy in this particular case!)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top